Abstract
This paper gives a review of the basic tenets of self-efficacy theory and discusses several theoretical issues, including the relationship of the theory to other theories of the cognitive mediation of behaviour. It is argued that similar concept, operationally equivalent to self-efficacy had already been investigated in psychology prior to the appearance of self- efficacy theory. The existence of similar models proves and documents the meaningfulness of the concept. Such models need to be looked upon as compatible and complementary instead of competitive.Convergent evidence from diverse lines of research attest to the explanatory and predictive generality of the self-efficacy theory.
Highlights
U radu se daje prikaz teorije saimoefikasnosti, jedne od novijih kognitivnih teorija kojima se nastoji objasniti i pred vidjeti ponašanje čovjeka
This paper gives a review of the basic tenets of self-efficacy theory and discusses several theoretical issues, including the relationship of the theory to other theories of the cognitive mediation of behaviour
It is a r gued that similar concept, operationally equivalent to self-efficacy had al ready been investigated in psychology prior to the appearance of self- ef ficacy theory
Summary
U radu se daje prikaz teorije saimoefikasnosti (self-efficacy theory), jedne od novijih kognitivnih teorija kojima se nastoji objasniti i pred vidjeti ponašanje čovjeka. Prema teoriji postoje dva osnovna tipa očekivanja: (1) očekivanje ishoda (outcome expectancy), odnosno uvjerenje dia će neko ponašanje dovesti (ili da neće dovesti) do željenog ishoda, i (2) očekivanje osobne efikasnosti (self-efficacy expectancy), tj. Osoba s višim stupnjem uvjerenja u osobnu efikasnost (većim oče kivanjim a osobne kompetentnosti) lakše će pokretati neke oblike pona šanja za koje očekuje da će voditi željenim ishodima (Bandura, 1977; Locke i sur.,1984), bit će ustrajnija kada naiđe na poteškoće ili probleme u realizaciji aktualnog ponašanja (Brown i Inouye, 1978; Schunk, 1981), intenzivirat će nastojanja kada su učinci približe cilju (Bandura i Cervo" ne, 1983), svoje će greške objašnjavati (atribuirati) na način koji svjedoči o orijentaciji k uspjehu (Collins, 1982, prema Bandura, 1984), potenci jalno opasnim zadacima pristupat će se bez anksioznosti, i rjeđe će mani festirati stresne reakcije (Bandura i sur., 1982; Leland, 1982, prema Bandura, 1984). Ako očekivanje osobne efikasnosti ima navedene efekte, može se s velikom vjerojatnošću pretpostaviti da mjera očekivanja osobne efi kasnosti može poslužiti kao dobar prediktor ponašanja kloje slijedi
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Papers on Philosophy, Psychology, Sociology and Pedagogy
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
