Tendências de incompletude das variáveis epidemiológicas dos Registros Hospitalares de Câncer de mulheres com neoplasia maligna da mama no Espírito Santo, Brasil

Analysis of the Gene Coding for the BRCA2-Interacting Protein PALB2 in Familial and Sporadic Pancreatic Cancer

Eligibility Criteria and Genetic Testing Results from a High-Risk Cohort for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome in Southeastern Ontario

Family history of patients with breast cancer after treatment of Hodgkin's disease in childhood

BRCA in breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Recommendations

Background: Guidelines recommend germline mutation testing of breast cancer predisposition genes in triple negative (TN) breast cancer cases with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer or when diagnosed under age 60. However, the prevalence of mutations in these genes among TN cases unselected for family history of breast or ovarian cancer is not known. Methods: To assess the frequency of mutations in 16 predisposition genes in TN cases we screened a large cohort of TN patients (n=1824) unselected for family history of breast or ovarian cancer from 12 centers and 824 study matched unaffected controls for mutations using a panel-based sequencing approach. Results: Deleterious mutations were identified in 15% of TN patients: 8.5% had BRCA1, 2.7% had BRCA2, and 3.6% had mutations in 12 other genes. Mutations in non-BRCA1/2 genes encoding proteins implicated in homologous recombination repair of DNA double strand breaks were detected at the same frequency as in breast cancer families. TN cases with mutations had high-grade tumors and were diagnosed at an earlier age than non-mutated cases. However, 10% of TN cases diagnosed at ≥60 years and 5% with no family history of cancer were also found to carry mutations. Inactivating mutations in non-BRCA1/2 predisposition genes were associated with moderate to high risks of TN breast cancer. Conclusions: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines support clinical genetic testing of breast cancer predisposition genes in 95% of TN breast cancer patients carrying mutations in susceptibility genes. In contrast, National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines in the U.K. do not support genetic testing of a substantial proportion of TN patients with predisposing alleles. Frequency tables for inherited mutations in known predisposition genes based on age of diagnosis and family history of cancer will allow for selection of TN patients most likely to carry mutations in the predisposition genes. Citation Format: Fergus J Couch, Steven N Hart, Priyanka Sharma, Amanda Ewart Toland, Penelope Miron, Janet E Olson, Andrew Godwin, Vernon S Pankratz, Curtis Olswold, Seth Slettedahl, Lucia Guidugli, Matthias W Beckmann, Brigitte Rack, Arif B Ekici, Irene Konstantopoulou, Florentia Fostira, George Fountzilas, Liisa M Pelttari, Song Yao, Judy Garber, Angela Cox, Hiltrud Brauch, Christine Ambrosone, Heli Nevanlinna, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Susan L Slager, Celine M Vachon, Diana M Eccles, Peter A Fasching. Triple-negative breast cancer: Frequency of inherited mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-12-03.

BackgroundTo assess the importance of heredity in the etiology of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), we compared IBC patients to several carefully chosen comparison groups with respect to the prevalence of first-degree family history of breast cancer.MethodsIBC cases (n = 141) were compared to non-inflammatory breast cancer cases (n = 178) ascertained through George Washington University (GWU) with respect to the prevalence of first-degree family history of breast cancer and selected environmental/lifestyle risk factors for breast cancer. Similar comparisons were conducted with subjects from three case–control studies: breast cancer cases (n = 1145) and unaffected controls (n = 1142) from the Cancer Genetic Markers of Susceptibility (CGEMS) study, breast cancer cases (n = 465) and controls (n = 9317) from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study, and ovarian cancer cases (n = 260) and controls (n = 331) from a study by University of Toronto (UT).ResultsThe frequency of first-degree breast cancer family history among IBC cases was 17.0 % compared to 24.4 % for GWU breast cancer cases, 23.9 % and 17.9 % for CGEMS breast cancer cases and controls, respectively, 16.9 % and 12.6 % for WHI breast cancer cases and controls, respectively, and 24.2 % and 11.2 % for UT ovarian cancer cases and controls, respectively.IBC cases had a significantly lower prevalence of parous women than WHI breast cancer cases (OR = 0.46, 95 % CI:0.27–0.81) and controls (OR = 0.31, 95 % CI:0.20–0.49). Oral contraceptive use was significantly higher among IBC cases compared to WHI breast cancer cases (OR = 7.77, 95 % CI:4.82–12.59) and controls (OR = 8.14, 95 % CI:5.28–12.61). IBC cases had a significantly higher frequency of regular alcohol consumption (≥1 drink per day) compared to WHI controls (OR = 1.84, 95 % CI:1.20–2.82) and UT controls (OR = 1.86, 95 % CI:1.07–3.22) and higher (statistically non-significant) prevalence (21.3 %) compared to breast cancer cases from GWU (18.2 %) and WHI (15.2 %).ConclusionsThe prevalence of first-degree breast cancer family history among IBC cases was lower compared to breast and ovarian cancer cases but higher than unaffected individuals. Our multiple-case inflammatory and non-inflammatory breast cancer families may reflect aggregation of common genetic and/or environmental factors predisposing to both types of breast cancer. Our findings that oral contraceptive use and regular alcohol consumption may be associated with IBC warrant further investigations.

Breast and ovarian cancers account for approximately 210 000 newly diagnosed cases per year. More than half a million American women are estimated to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of characteristics such as, age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity and family history of cancer with inherited BRCA1 mutations in a population-based sample of breast and ovarian cancer cases. No selection was made by race, age at diagnosis or positive family history of breast or ovarian cancer. The population under study was all breast cancer cases diagnosed in Orange County, CA, during the 1-year period beginning 1 March 1994 and all ovarian cancer cases diagnosed in Orange County during the 2-year period beginning 1 March 1994. This report focuses on the first consecutively ascertained 802 participating probands enrolled in the study, of which 9 were male breast cancer probands, 673 were female breast cancer probands and 120 were ovarian cancer probands. We observed 11 BRCA1 mutations or 1.6% (95% CI: 0.8–2.9) among the 673 female breast cancer probands and 4 BRCA1 mutations or 3.3% (95% CI: 0.8–8.3) among the 120 ovarian cancer probands. No BRCA1 mutations were identified among the 98 non-white breast and ovarian cancer probands. The prevalence of BRCA1 mutations in non-Hispanic-white breast cancer cases below the age of 50 years was 2%. Positive family history of breast or ovarian cancers was significantly associated with BRCA1 mutation status among breast cancer probands. Similarly, positive family history of breast or ovarian cancer was significantly associated with BRCA1 mutation status among the ovarian cancer probands. In summary, we present results on the prevalence of BRCA1 mutations in a significantly larger sample of population-based breast and ovarian cancer cases than previously reported. The results indicate that, using a conservative approach to targeted genotyping of BRCA1, the frequency of mutations was consistent with those reported using similar methods of population-based case ascertainment.

Background Women with a family history of breast cancer (BC) in first-degree female relatives have an increased risk of BC. The aim of this study was to determine the BC risk associated with exposure to endogenous and exogenous hormones in familial BC compared with non-familial BC. Materials and methods A population-based prospective questionnaire-based cohort was initiated in 1990 in the South Swedish Health Care Region. Forty thousand healthy women between ages 25 to 65 years were randomly selected, out of which 29,520 answered the first questionnaire. Data was subsequently collected from several registries and a second questionnaire. Familial BC was defined as having first-degree relatives (mother, sisters, and/or daughters) diagnosed with BC. Known mutation carriers in BRCA-related genes (n = 13) were excluded from all analyses. To determine whether there are any differences between familial and non-familial BC risk according to hormonal exposures, Cox proportional hazard models were used. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and all models were adjusted for birthdate. Results At the end of follow-up (10/31/2013), 1,500 (5%) of the women were diagnosed with BC. Out of the 1,500 BC cases, 192 women (13%) had a family history of BC. Having a family history of BC in first-degree relatives was twice as prevalent among BC cases compared with women without BC diagnosis (OR 1.9 (CI 1.63-2.23)). When adjusting for age at menarche and ever-use of oral contraceptives (OC), an increased age at first full-time pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of BC, both for BC cases with familial BC and non-familial BC, HR 1.02 (CI 1.00-1.03) and HR 1.01 (CI 1.00-1.02), respectively. Adjusted for age at menarche and parity, an increased risk of BC was associated with use of OC before age 20 (HR 1.7 (CI 0.99-2.80)) for BC cases with familial BC compared with non-BC cases with familial BC. This was not observed in women with non-familial BC. Conclusion The main findings in this study were that older age at first full-time pregnancy has a larger impact on BC risk in women with familial BC than in women without, and that use of OC before age 20 increases the risk of BC in women with familial BC, not observed in women without. Well known familial and/or hormonal risk factors for BC were observed in our study, implying the validity of the cohort. Our results indicate similarities in risk of BC between women with, and without, familial BC regarding age at first full-term pregnancy. However, the impact seems to be larger in familial BC. If confirmed in other studies, our findings could be of interest for women with familial BC, especially regarding the increased risk when using OC during adolescence, where other alternatives are available. Citation Format: Annelie Augustinsson, Carolina Ellberg, Ulf Kristoffersson, Håkan Olsson. Increasing age at first full-time pregnancy correlates to use of oral contraceptives before age 20 in women with a family history of breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2747. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2747

Introduction: Family history of breast cancer has been shown to be a strong risk factor for breast cancer in all populations studied. However, there are limited data related to risk of estrogen receptor negative (ER-) breast cancer in African American women, who have a disproportionately high incidence of ER- and triple negative (ER-, progesterone receptor negative, and HER2 receptor negative; TN) breast cancer. Even less information is available on whether a family history of other cancers also affects risk of ER- and TN breast cancer. Methods: Questionnaire data from the Black Women's Health Study, the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, the Multiethnic Cohort Study, and the Women's Circle of Health Study were pooled as part of the African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk (AMBER) Consortium. Breast cancer cases were classified as ER+, ER-, and TN based on pathology data from medical records and/or state cancer registries. Participants were asked about first degree relatives with a breast cancer diagnosis and the age at which the relative was diagnosed. Participants were also asked about first degree relatives with prostate, lung, colorectal, ovarian, or cervical cancer or with lymphoma or leukemia. Polytomous logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for various categories of positive family history relative to no first degree relative with breast cancer or no first degree relative with any of the cancers. Multivariable analyses controlled for age, study, time period, and other potential confounders. Results: The analysis included 3,023 African American women with ER+, 1,497 with ER-, and 696 with TN breast cancer and 17,420 controls. First degree family history of breast cancer, regardless of whether first degree relatives had cancers other than breast cancer, was associated with a 70% increased risk of ER+, ER- and TN breast cancer; the ORs were 1.7 (95% CI 1.6-2.0) for ER+, 1.7 (95% CI 1.4-1.9) for ER-, and 1.7 (95% CI 1.4-2.1) for TN breast cancer. The ORs were somewhat higher if the relative was diagnosed before age 50 (2.0 for ER+, 1.9 for ER-, and 1.8 for TN). Among the six other cancer sites examined, only family history of cervical cancer was significantly associated with risk; the ORs were 2.4 (1.4-4.2) for ER- and 2.9 (1.5-5.5) for TN breast cancer and there was no association with ER+ breast cancer. The OR for family history of ovarian cancer in relation to TN breast cancer was 1.6 (0.9-2.7), which is of interest because findings from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) indicate that serous ovarian cancers and basal-like breast cancers, which are mostly triple negative, have many molecular commonalities. The ORs for a family history of both breast and prostate cancer versus no family history of any of the cancers were 3.4 (2.4-4.7) for ER+ cancer, as compared with 1.6 for breast alone (p-interaction=0.01), and 2.1 (1.2-3.7) for ER- cancer, as compared with 1.5 for breast alone (p-interaction=0.08). The OR for a family history of both breast and lung cancer was 3.3 (1.9-5.9) for TN breast cancer, compared to 1.5 for breast alone (p-interaction=0.10). The ORs for family history of breast plus two other cancers were 2.4 (1.6-3.6) for ER+, 2.8 (1.6-4.7) for ER-, and 2.7 (1.3-5.7) for TN breast cancer. Conclusion: Our results confirm that having a first degree family history of breast cancer is a strong risk factor for ER+, ER-, and TN breast cancer. The findings also suggest that having relatives with other cancers in addition to a relative with breast cancer may further increase risk. Consideration of family history of other cancers may improve risk prediction models. The association observed for family history of cervical cancer and increased risk of ER- and TN breast cancer was unexpected and needs to be replicated by other studies. Citation Format: Traci N. Bethea, Lynn Rosenberg, Nelsy Castro-Webb, Kathryn L. Lunetta, Lara E. Sucheston, Edward A. Ruiz-Narvaez, Marjory Charlot, Song Y. Park, Elisa V. Bandera, Melissa A. Troester, Christine B. Ambrosone, Julie R. Palmer. Relation of family history of cancer to risk of ER+, ER-, and triple-negative breast cancer in African American women. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eighth AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 13-16, 2015; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25(3 Suppl):Abstract nr C49.

A homozygous mutation in the RAD51C gene was recently found to cause Fanconi anemia-like disorder. Furthermore, six heterozygous deleterious RAD51C mutations were detected in German breast and ovarian cancer families. We screened 277 Finnish familial breast or ovarian cancer patients for RAD51C and identified two recurrent deleterious mutations (c.93delG and c.837+1G>A). These mutations were further genotyped in 491 familial breast cancer patients, 409 unselected ovarian cancer patients and two series of unselected breast cancer cases (884 from Helsinki and 686 from Tampere) and population controls (1279 and 807, respectively). The mutation frequency among all breast cancer cases was not different from the controls (4 out of 2239, 0.2% versus population controls 2 out of 2086, 0.1%, P= 0.7). In the Helsinki series, each mutation was found in four cases with personal or family history of ovarian cancer. No mutations were found among cases with familial breast cancer only, four out of the eight carriers did not have family history of breast cancer. The mutations associated with an increased risk of familial breast and ovarian cancer (OR: 13.59, 95% CI 1.89-97.6, P= 0.026 compared with controls), but especially with familial ovarian cancer in the absence of breast cancer (OR: 213, 95% CI 25.6-1769, P= 0.0002) and also with unselected ovarian cancer (OR: 6.31, 95% CI 1.15-34.6, P= 0.033), with a significantly higher mutation rate among the familial cases (two out of eight, 25%) than the unselected ovarian cancer cases (4 out of 409, 1%) (OR: 33.8, 95% CI 5.15-221, P= 0.005). These results suggest RAD51C as the first moderate-to-high risk susceptibility gene for ovarian cancer.

Genetics in Clinical Cancer Care: A Promise Unfulfilled among Minority Populations

The evidence on the relation of family history of cancers other than breast cancer to breast cancer risk is conflicting, and most studies have not assessed specific breast cancer subtypes. We assessed the relation of first-degree family history of breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, ovarian, and cervical cancer and lymphoma or leukemia, to the risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER(+)), ER(-), and triple-negative breast cancer in data from the African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Consortium. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI). There were 3,023 ER(+) and 1,497 ER(-) breast cancer cases (including 696 triple-negative cases) and 17,420 controls. First-degree family history of breast cancer was associated with increased risk of each subtype: OR = 1.76 (95% CI, 1.57-1.97) for ER(+), 1.67 (1.42-1.95) for ER(-), and 1.72 (1.38-2.13) for triple-negative breast cancer. Family history of cervical cancer was associated with increased risk of ER(-) (OR = 2.39; 95% CI, 1.36-4.20), but not ER(+) cancer. Family history of both breast and prostate cancer was associated with increased risk of ER(+) (3.40; 2.42-4.79) and ER(-) (2.09; 1.21-3.63) cancer, but family history of both breast and lung cancer was associated only with ER(-) cancer (2.11; 1.29-3.46). A family history of cancers other than breast may influence the risk of breast cancer, and associations may differ by subtype. Greater surveillance and counseling for additional screening may be warranted for women with a family history of cancer.

No mutations in the BACH1 gene in BRCA1 and BRCA2 negative breast-cancer families linked to 17q22.

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed invasive cancer among women both globally and within the United States and the number one cause of cancer-related deaths among women globally ([1, 2][1]). Less than 1% of diagnosed breast cancers occur in men ([2][2]) and, therefore, male breast cancer is

Background - There is suggestive evidence of familial clustering of breast and prostate cancer in first-degree relatives; women with a family history of prostate cancer are at increased risk of breast cancer. Few studies have investigated joint family history of breast and prostate cancer and prostate cancer risk, and no study to date has examined lethal prostate cancer. Methods - We studied 42,672 from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study between 1996 to 2012. During follow-up, 4,258 prostate cancer cases were diagnosed, of whom 380 were lethal disease. Men self-reported family history of breast and prostate cancer, including in siblings or parents. Using cause-specific hazards regression, we estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the association between family history and prostate cancer risk and progression. Results - About 8% of men had a family history of prostate cancer, 8.7% had a family history of breast cancer, and 1.4% of men had a family history of both breast and prostate cancer. A family history of prostate cancer was significantly associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.54-1.85). Increased risk was higher for men with a father diagnosed with prostate cancer (HR: 1.64 95% CI: 1.49-1.80) than for men with a diagnosis in a brother(s) (HR: 1.51 95% CI: 1.27-1.80). A positive family history of breast cancer was associated with a small, but significant 22% increased risk (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.11-1.35). Familial breast cancer in a sister (HR: 1.22 95% CI: 1.06-1.41) increased risk more than familial breast cancer in a mother (HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.99-1.25). Men with a family history of both prostate and breast cancer had a 52% (HR: 1.52; 95%CI: 1.23-1.88) increased risk of prostate cancer compared to men with no family history of either cancer. Risk of lethal prostate cancer was also significantly increased for men with a positive family history of prostate cancer (HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.20-2.24), as well as for men with a family history of breast cancer (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.07-2.01). Conclusions - These results support the findings of familial aggregation of breast and prostate cancer, and for the first time suggest an association between familial breast cancer and lethal prostate cancer. Data from this prospective study have translational relevance for family counseling of cancer patients. Citation Format: Lauren E. Barber, Travis A. Gerke, Sarah C. Markt, Giovanni Parmigiani, Lorelei A. Mucci. A family affair: Prostate cancer risk and family history of breast or prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2543.