Abstract

BackgroundNovel therapies for anticoagulation and rhythm control for atrial fibrillation (AF) have been developed recently. To best evaluate the comparative effectiveness of newer agents, practice patterns and outcomes of existing therapies must be characterized at the population level. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study of patients ≥ 65 years with a first diagnosis of AF over a 9-year period in Québec and Ontario. Using hospital and drug claims databases, trends of filled prescriptions, and rates of strokes, bleeding complications, and mortality within 1 year were estimated. ResultsFrom 1998 to 2006, 338, 479 patients were hospitalized with an AF diagnosis. Median age was 77.5 years and 50.4% were male. Use of rate control was 3-fold higher than rhythm control therapy. There was a modest decrease in rate control therapy until 2001 (71.9% to 70.6%, P = 0.01), followed by a progressive increase (70.6% to 76.4%, P = 0.014). An opposite trend was observed for rhythm control. Although warfarin prescriptions increased (51.0% to 64.5%, P < 0.0001), stroke rates tended to decrease (3.8% to 3.5%, P = 0.148). Bleeding complications increased mostly because of emergency room visits (4.8% to 6.1%, P = 0.007). Mortality remained high despite a small but statistically significant decline (27.6% to 25.8%, P = 0.018). ConclusionsWith increased anticoagulation use, stroke rates are declining and emergency room bleeding complications are increasing. Despite an increased use of evidence-based AF therapies, mortality remains high in this population. These findings highlight the need to focus on AF prevention in addition to minimizing its complications.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.