Abstract

To assess temporal improvement of prostate image reporting and data system (PIRADS) 3-5 lesion correlation to histopathologic findings from radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa). A total of 1481 patients who underwent RP for biopsy-proven PCa between 2015 and 2019 were divided into 14 groups of 100 sequential readings for the evaluation of histopathological correlation with PIRADS readings. Temporal trends of PIRADS distribution and predictive performance for RP pathology were evaluated to assess underlying changes in prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation by radiologists. PIRADS 4-5 lesions were significantly correlated with the increasing rates of Gleason Group (GG) upgrade (p=0.044) and decreasing rate of GG downgrade (p=0.016) over time. PIRADS ≥3 lesions read after median 2years of experience were shown to independently predict intermediate-high-risk (GG≥3) PCa (odds ratio 2.93, 95% confidence interval 1.00-8.54; P=0.049) in RP pathology. Preoperative GG≥3 biopsy lesions with PIRADS 4-5 lesions were significantly more susceptible to GG upgrade (P=0.035) and GG≥4 RP pathology (p=0.003) in experienced reads, in contrast to insignificant findings in early readings (p=0.588 and 0.248, respectively). Preoperative MRI reports matched with RP pathology suggest an improved prediction of adverse pathology in PIRADS 3-5 lesions over time, suggesting a temporal change in PIRADS interpretation and predictive accuracy. Institutions with low volume experience should use caution in solely relying on MRI for predicting tumor characteristics. Future prospective trials and larger scale assessments are required to further validate our results.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.