Abstract

Stochastic production frontier analysis is applied in decomposing output growth of grass silage production to technical change, technical efficiency change, scale effect and input growth. For 1990–2000 in a complete panel of 138 Finnish farms, almost three fourths of the output growth was linked to input growth. The annual technical change, the shift of the production frontier, was on average 1.4 percent. Technical effi- ciency indicated a slightly decreasing tendency, less than 0.2 percent per year. Harvesting techniques were used as indicators of different technologies. The analysis showed that production frontiers differed between harvesting techniques. The choice of harvesting technique seemed to be related to circumstances on the farm. Thus, overall technical efficiency should not be interpreted as a measure of managerial competence when all the factors are not in the farmer’s control. Controlling background and production environment related factors yields a considerably lower level of technical inefficiency than the models without the control. It is also shown that in general a more productive harvesting technique may be on average less effi- ciently utilized when compared to its own frontier.;

Highlights

  • Stochastic production frontier analysis is applied in decomposing output growth of grass silage production to technical change, technical efficiency change, scale effect and input growth

  • The analysis showed that production frontiers differed between harvesting techniques

  • This paper dealt with the determination of technical change, technical efficiency change and scale effect in grass silage production of 138 panel farms for 1990–2000

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stochastic production frontier analysis is applied in decomposing output growth of grass silage production to technical change, technical efficiency change, scale effect and input growth. Technical efficiency indicated a slightly decreasing tendency, less than 0.2 percent per year. The analysis showed that production frontiers differed between harvesting techniques. It is shown that in general a more productive harvesting technique may be on average less efficiently utilized when compared to its own frontier. In Finland a large share of livestock diets has consisted of grass – either pasture, hay or silage. Especially dairy cows, require a relatively high share of forage in their diet, the proportion of silage, hay and cultivated grass pasture has amounted to almost one third of the total farmed land area in Finland. Grass silage substituted for hay and especially after 1993, when milk quota became tradable and since 1995 when Finland joined European Union, milk production on specialised dairy farms started to grow

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.