Abstract

At an international level, teachers’ work is increasingly circumscribed and regulated. Notions of accountability have shifted from primarily inputs to primary outcomes, and investment in strengthening teacher performance evaluation has expanded. At the same time, investment in enhancing the quality of teacher education programs is contested in many countries. Occupational professionalism, that is, a traditional, historic form characterized by discretionary decision-making, collegial authority, and trust in the practitioner, has been replaced by organizational professionalism that incorporates target-setting and performance review. The overarching question in this study concerns the meaningfulness and appropriateness of using student perceived instructional quality for the estimation of teaching quality in comparison to teacher specialization. The study investigates relations between fourth grade students’ reading achievement levels, teacher specialization, and student perceptions of instructional quality, based on the Swedish PIRLS 2011 data. Performing two-level structural modeling with latent variables, this study revealed a positive relationship between teacher specialization relevant for the grade and subject taught, and student reading achievement. By contrast, there was no association between student perceptions of instructional quality and student reading achievement, or between instructional quality and teacher specialization. The results raise questions about the benefit of student evaluations of teacher classroom practices from both a validity perspective, as well as from a teacher professionalization perspective. However, the cross-sectional data used does not allow for causal inference, and further research on the relationships between teacher specialization, student perceived instructional quality, and student achievement is therefore needed.

Highlights

  • In recent decades, research has increasingly emphasized the importance of developing and maintaining a high-quality teaching force

  • The present study explores and compares relations between two measures of teacher quality—whereof one is a distal measure and the other is more proximal to teaching practice—and their relation to student achievement

  • A traditional, occupational teacher professionalism, characterized by meritocracy, collegial authority, discretionary decision-making, and a high level of trust, is increasingly contested. It is being replaced by an organizational professionalism that emphasizes accountability, target-setting, and performance review

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research has increasingly emphasized the importance of developing and maintaining a high-quality teaching force. While some researchers argue that investing in high-quality preparation is the most promising approach, others suggest that better facilitating entry to teacher education would attract stronger candidates (Boyd et al 2009: Ingersoll 2007). Issues about how best to design and organize teacher preparation have become increasingly prominent in undertakings to improve teacher quality. In this debate, there is an important underlying assumption that assessment of teacher quality in the classroom context can filter out poor-quality teachers, and effectively stimulate instructional improvement. In a review of existing literature, Hallinger et al (2014) found little support for the belief that teacher evaluation represents a high-impact school improvement strategy

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.