Abstract
Anderson and Barber (2010) provide a recent discussion of tax effects on economic damages, for forensic economists and similar experts who supply the courts with opinions on economic damages. Anderson and Barbers’ paper fills a void in the forensic economics literature, by offering a formal theory of how tax considerations can impact economic damages. In the present work I point out a limitation of this theory - via a counter-example, and discuss conditions under which the theory seems to hold approximately.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
