Abstract
Plasma concentrations of drugs and drug metabolites in bioavailability studies are routinely bioassayed with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography (GC), and liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) methods. In the 1980s and 1990s, HPLC had achieved a relevant role compared to GC and other techniques in pharmacokinetic bioassays. However, in the last few years the LC-MS-MS technique, known as tandem mass spectrometry, has attained a predominant role over all other techniques. This is because it requires a less amount of matrix, possesses better specificity and sensitivity, and requires a shorter operating time. In the experience of the authors, LC-MS-MS in fact requires on average 3-4 fold shorter time to complete a bioequivalence study when performed by one operator than does HPLC. The higher cost of the apparatus and technical assistance of LC-MS-MS are fully compensated by the shorter operating time. Part or most of the HPLC apparatuses have been or are being replaced by LC-MS-MS systems in laboratories operating in clinical and pre-clinical pharmacokinetics and, to a large extent, in those involved in assessing permeability in screening procedures of new chemical entities. This paper analyses the growing development of the LC-MS-MS technique and compares four couples of methods validated with HPLC or GC versus LC-MS-MS, giving analytical details of the two approaches.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.