Abstract
Globally, there is a rapid development of urban heat island (UHI) detection tools, and their results can be accepted regardless of their accuracy in measuring the real impact of the phenomenon. In this study, we investigated various UHI measuring tools and analysed their findings to better interpret their reliability. The tools in the current research adopted remote sensing and field measurements including those using air temperature monitors and thermal imaging technologies to examine the multiple urban structures of four cases in the Greater Cairo Region. The results showed that UHI detection by remote sensing analysis was affected by normalised difference vegetation index. In contrast, field measurements were also influenced by the albedo of morphological materials present. The conclusions revealed that the tools do not provide the same results and indicate that studying UHIs in the built environment differs from investigating it in a two-dimensional layer using remote sensing.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.