Abstract

When banks are confronted with systemic crises, some banks reduce the credit risk in their loan portfolios, whereas others exploit potential government bailouts and increase their internal credit risk in their loan portfolios. Using a connectedness sample method identifying managerial styles based on both asset and liability side positions, I find that asset innovators most aggressively reduce within-bank credit risk during financial crises, whereas liability innovators respond by increasing internal bank credit risk. In contrast, during non-crisis periods, the bank’s credit risk is positively related to its systemic risk exposure, indicating a baseline risk-taking proclivity. Results are robust to within-loan, GMM, and lead-lag analysis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.