Abstract
Summary In this study, different versions of autoregressive error models are evaluated as post-processors for probabilistic streamflow forecasts. The post-processors account for hydrologic uncertainties that are introduced by the precipitation–runoff model. The post-processors are evaluated with the discrete ranked probability score (DRPS), and a non-parametric bootstrap is applied to investigate the significance of differences in model performance. The results show that differences in performance between most model versions are significant. For these cases it is found that (1) error models with state dependent parameters perform better than those with constant parameters, (2) error models with an empirical distribution for the description of the standardized residuals perform better than those with a normal distribution, and (3) procedures that use a logarithmic transformation of the original streamflow values perform better than those that use a square root transformation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
