Abstract

Abstract. This study introduces the Systematic Correlation Matrix Evaluation (SCoMaE) method, a bottom–up approach which combines expert judgment and statistical information to systematically select transparent, nonredundant indicators for a comprehensive assessment of the state of the Earth system. The methods consists of two basic steps: (1) the calculation of a correlation matrix among variables relevant for a given research question and (2) the systematic evaluation of the matrix, to identify clusters of variables with similar behavior and respective mutually independent indicators. Optional further analysis steps include (3) the interpretation of the identified clusters, enabling a learning effect from the selection of indicators, (4) testing the robustness of identified clusters with respect to changes in forcing or boundary conditions, (5) enabling a comparative assessment of varying scenarios by constructing and evaluating a common correlation matrix, and (6) the inclusion of expert judgment, for example, to prescribe indicators, to allow for considerations other than statistical consistency. The example application of the SCoMaE method to Earth system model output forced by different CO2 emission scenarios reveals the necessity of reevaluating indicators identified in a historical scenario simulation for an accurate assessment of an intermediate–high, as well as a business-as-usual, climate change scenario simulation. This necessity arises from changes in prevailing correlations in the Earth system under varying climate forcing. For a comparative assessment of the three climate change scenarios, we construct and evaluate a common correlation matrix, in which we identify robust correlations between variables across the three considered scenarios.

Highlights

  • An indicator is a quantitative value, measured or calculated, that describes relevant aspects of the state of a defined system

  • To illustrate the construction of the matrix based on our example simulations, we show how the correlation between changes in global mean “surface air temperature” (A_sat) and “Northern Hemisphere sea ice area” (O_iceareaN) in the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 emission scenario (Meinshausen et al, 2011) due to the parameter perturbations translates to the corresponding correlation matrix entry (Fig. 1)

  • To demonstrate the Systematic Correlation Matrix Evaluation (SCoMaE) method, we applied it to correlation matrices constructed with changes in Earth system variables of an intermediate-complexity Earth system model, with which we simulated three forcing scenarios

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An indicator is a quantitative value, measured or calculated, that describes relevant aspects of the state of a defined system. To illustrate the SCoMaE method, we exemplarily select indicators to answer the following research question: “How are changes in the climate system influenced by the sensitivity of the marine and terrestrial biological system to temperature and CO2?” This example application enables us to (1) illustrate how a correlation matrix can be constructed given a specific research question, (2) identify a comprehensive indicator set, (3) show that an indicator set derived from a certain forcing scenario is not necessarily appropriate to assess a changed forcing scenario, (4) identify a common indicator set valid for multiple forcing scenarios, and (5) illustrate how the method could be used in an iterative process including expert judgment or previous knowledge of the given system These steps will serve as the guideline of this paper

Defining the research question for the SCoMaE example case
Model description
Spin-up and scenario forcing
Parameter perturbations
14 Subtract
Vertical ocean diffusivity
Lower bounds of biological temperature sensitivity
Vegetation and soil sensitivity to temperature
CO2 fertilization of vegetation
CO2 sensitivity of transpiration
Stoichiometric changes in response to changing ocean carbonate chemistry
Step 1: calculate the correlation matrix
Step 2: cluster identification and indicator selection
Construct correlation matrix
What were we able to learn from the example?
Limitation of the analyses from the example
Findings
Discussion of the SCoMaE method
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.