Abstract

Derivatives [closo‐B10H8‐1,10‐(CN)2]2– and [closo‐B10H8‐1,10‐(OCHNMe2)2], efficiently obtained from [closo‐B10H8‐1,10‐(IPh)2] by nucleophilic substitution with CN– and DMF, were envisioned as precursors to diacid [closo‐B10H8‐1,10‐(COOH)2]2– and to dihydroxy derivative [closo‐B10H8‐1,10‐(OH)2]2–, respectively. Attempts at hydrolysis or reduction of the dinitrile gave no reaction or complex mixtures of products. In contrast, the DMF adduct was cleanly hydrolyzed to diformate [closo‐B10H8‐1,10‐(OCHO)2]2– and subsequently to protonated dihydroxy [closo‐B10H8‐1,10‐(OH2)2]. The latter was O‐acylated with PhCOCl. Crystal and molecular structures of five derivatives were established by single crystal XRD methods and compared to those for other [closo‐B10H8‐1,10‐X2]2– derivatives. Trends in molecular geometry in the series and also reactivity of the dinitrile and intermediates were corroborated and correlated with DFT results (B3LYP/TZVP) by analysis of bonding, charge distribution and vibrational frequencies.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.