Sustainable Food Processing and Engineering Challenges

Food industry and engineering—Quo vadis?

<scp>IFST</scp> vision for a <scp>UK</scp>‐wide national food strategy

Chapter 8 - Intelligent Packaging: Sustainable food processing and engineering challenges

Technology offers sustainable nutrition solutions

Serving up graduates

Triangular relation of food processing, nutrition, and osteoarthritis: A solution for the management and prevention of osteoarthritis?

Sustainable Food Processing and Engineering Challenges

Meat-based diets are still the norm, and vegans and vegetarians represent only a small minority of the population. A transition, respectively, behavioural change towards a diet with less meat can only occur by adopting a positive attitude towards dietary changes based on reasons and motivations. The main aim of this study is to apply the meat attachment scale (MEAS) in Germany in order to analyse if this construct is a barrier towards a diet with less meat in this country. For this purpose, the impact of meat attachment on the trust in different protein alternatives (plant-based, insects, cultured meat) and related food processing technologies is analysed. The findings reveal that a high level of meat attachment goes along with lower trust in plant-based proteins. Similar holds for cultured meat and insect proteins. Thus it appears that, at least for the moment, cultured meat or proteins from insects are not a logical substitute for the heavily meat attached consumer. Furthermore, in the analysis, we considered if meat attachment as measured by the MEAS is correlated with other scales/preferences such as food neophobia, social trust, and attitude towards respective preference for organic products. Literature shows that all mentioned constructs impact the acceptance, preference or trust in more sustainable food product innovation, respectively, more sustainable food processing techniques. The outcome of the correlation analysis demonstrated that in particular food neophobia and meat attachment are not correlated with each other. That is, the MEAS represents a predictor for trust in food (processing) technologies as e.g. plant-based proteins or cultured meat that is independent of the neophobia construct.

From the Chief Executive and <scp>IFST</scp> News

Chapter three - Application of membrane technology in functional food and nutraceutical industries

The ‘daily bread’ for over six billion people today is largely derived from plant sources. The history of plant use reaches back uninterrupted to our earliest hominid ancestors. There is a long tradition of regarding the origins of agriculture (Hannery, 1973) as an important stage in the development of human society. Whilst acknowledging its significance, an equally profound revolution has passed unnoticed, this is the revolution in food processing and technology. The theme of the present paper is to discuss new ‘food technologies’ and the impact they have had, and are likely to have, on our society. Before we examine the ‘new’ food technologies, it

Protein diversification

The depletion of natural resources and increasing food consumption together with their food waste showing the urge to practice the sustainable food processing. The instrument of sustainable food processing (i-KProM) questionnaire was used to determine the right practices constructs for TVET students’ in sustainable food processing and the related predictive factor. This study was conducted in TVET institutional in Perak which offering the Certification of Food Processing and Quality Control. An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) for validity test and reliability test was used to measure the instrument and give an empirical verification of the construct validity and reliability of the questionnaire. Literature search and pilot study within the population were carried out and appropriate item was extracted. Initially, 37 items developed for sustainable food processing practices, however, only 23 items were remaining as an item investigate and 14 items found as not sufficient as required for EFA. For an independent variable of the research, 36 items remain which include five factors extracted. The sustainable food processing instrument (i-KProM) have been approved to have sufficient validity and reliability.

Consumers are interested in sustainable and safe food with positive sensory attributes, either minimally processed or incorporating sustainable processes. However, the introduction of new food technologies may generate concern among consumers. This study aims to identify ways to decrease consumers' risk perception of new technologies: High pressure, Non-thermal Plasma, Pulsed Electric Field, and Ultrasound. This cross-cultural study was conducted in three contrasting countries: Portugal, Germany, and the United Kingdom, recruiting over 400 consumers per country. The survey presented twelve constructs based on the Ecological Framework, which was used to predict perceived risk. Factors affecting such perception varied both for technologies and countries, as shown by a multiple regression model. Food technology neophobia, perceived relative severity, and trust were common factors across all countries. This study demonstrates that developing and producing new products using non-thermal technologies should consider the country's consumers' risk perception factors.

Proceeding THE 4th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOOD SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (ICFSE) 2022 11-12 October 2022, Surakarta, Indonesia ICFSE is a biannual conference held by the Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sebelas Maret since 2016. This event is in collaboration with partner universities and/or organizations around the world. This conference covers the field of Food Science and Engineering. It aims to drive collaboration between scholars, practitioners, private sectors, and policy makers within the field. The conference is mainly supported by the Department of Food Science and Technology, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia.This proceeding contains the papers presented in the 4th ICFSE organized in 2022. The papers involve sessions on physical modification of foods, food chemistry and analysis, instrumental techniques for food analysis, food microstructure development and characterization, food properties including thermal, chemical, and mechanical properties, rapid detection of food contamination, macronutrient, micronutrient, and functional properties, chemistry of food additives and preservatives, food processing and engineering, food packaging, sustainable food production, food waste utilization, mathematical modeling and software development for food processing purposes, application of artificial intelligence in food engineering, food supply chain management system and food nutrigenomics for health.We would like to thank all the participants attending this conference and also the committees for their contributions to this conference and its overall success. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their positive contribution to maintaining the quality of the articles presented in this proceeding.List of General Chair, Vice Chair, Organizer, Advisory Boards, Scientific Committees, Organizing Committees are available in this pdf.