Survival and clinical outcomes of the Eclipse stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative study of glenoid component designs and humeral head materials.

Considerable interest has been focused on the design of the glenoid component used in total shoulder arthroplasty in order to reduce the risk of loosening. One design-related feature that has attracted attention is whether to use pegged or keeled cemented glenoid components. The main purpose of this study was to compare the fixation of cemented keeled glenoid components with that of cemented in-line pegged glenoid components. In a prospective randomized study, we compared the stability of cemented, all-polyethylene, keeled glenoid components and cemented, all-polyethylene, in-line three-pegged glenoid components by radiostereometric analysis. Twenty-seven shoulders in twenty-five patients with osteoarthritis (twenty-two shoulders had primary and five shoulders had secondary osteoarthritis) were included. There were sixteen women and nine men, and the mean age was sixty-four years. Radiostereometric analysis and conventional radiographs were carried out at five days, at four months, and at one and two years postoperatively. The mean Constant and Murley score preoperatively and two years postoperatively was 25 and 70, respectively, for shoulders with the keeled glenoid component and 22 and 70 for the shoulders with a pegged component. No significant difference was detected between groups with regard to the average micromigration of the glenoid components at any of the time points. The average translation was <1 mm, while the median value was <0.3 mm at two years, with no significant difference between the different axes. In five shoulders (three with the keeled component and two with the pegged component), translation at two years was >1 mm. In fourteen shoulders (eight with the keeled and six with the pegged component), the rotation around one or several axes was >2 degrees . We were not able to detect any specific pattern with regard to movement for either type of component nor were we able to detect any difference between the two types of components in the way they migrated, if migration occurred. Cemented all-polyethylene keeled or in-line three-pegged glenoid components appear to have similar stability during the first two years after surgery. Studies with a longer follow-up period are needed to relate these findings to long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Glenoid component loosening remains a challenge in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). The aims of this study were to evaluate complications, implant survival, and revision rates in patients with primary and secondary osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing stemless aTSA using the Arthrex Eclipse humeral implant with a cemented pegged all-polyethylene glenoid component and to identify risk factors leading to revision. Of 211 patients who underwent primary stemless aTSA (using the Eclipse humeral component with a cemented pegged all-polyethylene glenoid) with prospectively documented data in a local registry, 197 were evaluated, grouped by OA pathology (primary OA, 153 patients; secondary OA, 44 patients). Demographic and functional data (e.g., age, sex, shoulder function) and the cause of OA were documented preoperatively in both groups. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess complications and implant revisions between the study groups. In addition, various radiographic parameters (e.g., glenoid morphology, critical shoulder angle, lateral acromion index, implant sizing [humeral component overhang], radial matching of the humeral and glenoid components, glenohumeral distance, and medial glenoid cement penetration) were evaluated to explore their potential association with revision. A subset of these parameters was subsequently included in the multivariable Cox model on the basis of clinical relevance. After a median postoperative period of 72 months, the overall revision rate was 51%. The reasons for revision were glenoid component loosening (85%), periprosthetic humeral fracture (9%), early rotator cuff failure (3%), and low-grade infection (3%). The median implant survival in patients with primary OA (95 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 84 to 108) was significantly longer than that in patients with secondary OA (71 months; 95% CI: 60 to 88; p = 0.027). Female patients had a significantly shorter time to revision than male patients (p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in complications or revision rates by OA pathology. Secondary OA, the presence of medial glenoid cement penetration, and an anterior overhang of the humeral component were associated with an increased risk of revision. Our findings indicate a high rate of glenoid component loosening as the primary cause of revision in patients with primary and secondary OA undergoing stemless aTSA with the Eclipse and a cemented pegged all-polyethylene glenoid component. This outcome emphasizes the need for careful consideration of implant design, patient selection criteria, and implant positioning and cementation in order to optimize implant survival. Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Although the first shoulder arthroplasty was implanted in 1893 by the French surgeon Jules-Emile Pean,[1][1] the development of the procedure came in the 1950s when Neer[2][2] described the results using a vitallium prosthesis to treat comminuted fractures of the head of the humerus. About 20

Early to midterm outcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty performed on dysplastic glenoids.

What's New in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.

All-polyethylene, hybrid, and modern metal-backed glenoid components show relevant but not significantly different outcomes in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Glenoid fixation strongly influences longevity and outcomes in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Keeled and pegged designs are common, but comparative evidence for function, range of motion, and survivorship is inconsistent. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted from database inception through December 2025. Thirteen comparative studies (n=3,219) met the inclusion criteria. Evaluated outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], Constant-Murley score, Simple Shoulder Test [SST], visual analog scale [VAS] pain scores), shoulder range of motion (flexion, external rotation, internal rotation), and implant-related outcomes, including failure and revision. Follow-up ranged from short to long-term (up to 26 years). Across pooled analyses, no significant differences were observed between pegged and keeled glenoid components in ASES (P=0.69), Constant-Murley (P=0.61), SST (P=0.74), or VAS pain scores (P=0.88). Postoperative flexion (P=0.61) and external rotation (P=0.35) were comparable between groups. Pegged glenoid components demonstrated a statistically significant but small improvement in internal rotation (mean difference, 1.60°; 95% CI, 0.54°-2.66°; P=0.003). Revision rates were significantly lower with pegged glenoid components compared with keeled designs (risk ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.86; P=0.01), while overall failure rates did not differ significantly between groups (P=0.07). Both designs yield similar pain relief, functional gains, and shoulder motion across most patient-reported outcome measures. Pegged components show lower revision risk and slightly better internal rotation, although survivorship findings are primarily supported by observational evidence. Selection should be individualized to anatomy, bone quality, and surgical factors, not expectations of superior overall function. Level of evidence: II.

Radiographic comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components using modern cementing techniques: A prospective randomized study

Short-term outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with nonaugmented glenoid component for Walch B2 and B3 glenoid morphology.

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with a B2 Glenoid Addressed with Corrective Reaming: Mean 8-year Follow-up.

BackgroundAspherical humeral head morphology has previously been shown to be associated with progression of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Habermeyer et al classified humeral head morphology as either spherical or aspherical. Aspherical head morphology was associated with increased incidence of glenoid deformity (B2) as well as decentering of the humeral head, but the authors did not correlate these findings to clinical outcomes. The purpose of this investigation is to apply these findings to the evaluation of clinical outcomes following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and to further define preoperative humeral head pathomorphology.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent primary aTSA who had adequate pre- and postoperative radiographs and 2-year follow-up. Preoperative radiographs were analyzed and humeral heads were classified as either spherical, mild aspherical, or major aspherical. Axillary images were evaluated to quantify centering of the humeral head and glenoid morphology. Postoperative radiographs were analyzed to quantify implant center of rotation (COR) utilizing the best fit circle technique. Patient-reported outcomes, range of motion and strength at 2-years postoperatively were recorded. Statistical significance was evaluated using chi-square and paired t-test statistics for both regression analysis and univariate analyses.ResultsA total of 259 patients met inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 158 patients (61%) were classified as spherical, 64 patients (25%) mild aspherical, and 37 patients (14%) major aspherical. Males were higher represented among patients with mild and major aspherical humeral heads. Aspherical humeral heads had a significantly higher incidence of B2 glenoid morphology, while spherical heads had a significantly higher incidence of A1 glenoids. Patients with aspherical humeral heads were found to have significantly worse external rotation preoperatively compared to those with spherical heads. There were no significant differences in postoperative range of motion. However, postoperative improvements in external rotational strength and belly press strength were significantly higher in patients with aspherical humeral heads. Preoperative humeral head morphology did not have any influence on patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up or on radiographic postoperative implant restoration of COR.Discussion/ConclusionAspherical head morphology was associated with a higher incidence of male gender and B2 glenoid morphology; however, humeral head deformity alone was not shown to lead to diminished outcomes or worse COR restoration following TSA. Patients with aspherical preoperative humeral head morphology were not found to have worse clinical or radiographic outcomes compared to patients with spherical heads; however, patients with aspherical humeral heads did make significant improvements in rotational strength at 2-year follow-up.

Mid- to long-term outcomes of a cemented, all-polyethylene pegged glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Mid-to long-term outcomes and CT-assessed radiolucency with cemented single-peg glenoid component for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) is commonly recommended for osteoarthritis, but its long-term durability remains a concern, particularly in younger, active patients. This systematic review evaluates the clinical and radiological outcomes of all-polyethylene (all-PE) glenoid components at a minimum tenyear follow-up. Conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, 15 studies involving 1163 procedures were identified. Inclusion required a mean follow-up exceeding nine years and the availability of radiographic analysis. Outcomes included rates of glenoid loosening, rotator cuff deficiency, clinical satisfaction, and implant survival. At a mean 11.8 year follow-up, radiographic glenoid loosening occurred in 41.0%; (95% CI: 30.0%-52.0%) of cases. Signs of cuff deficiency were observed in 210/599 cases (44.0%; 95% CI: 33.0%-55.0%). The overall revision rate was 17.0% (95%CI: 12.0%-23.0%), while the rate of objectively unsatisfactory clinical results was 31.0% (95%CI: 23.0%-40.0%). Survival rates were 93.0% (95%CI: 91.3-94.7%) at 10years, 85.1% (95%CI: 81.5-88.7%) at 15years and 82.5% (95%CI: 77.3-87.8%) at 20years. Pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. Long-term aTSA is associated with high rates of radiographic failure and soft-tissue insufficiency. A notable discrepancy exists between radiographic failure (41.0%) and lower revision rates (17.0%), suggesting that revision rates might underestimate actual failure. Thorough counseling regarding these cumulative failure risks is recommended for younger patients.

Background: Malpositioning of the glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) remains the primary source of loosening. The purpose of this study is firstly, to quantify postoperative glenoid component position in patients having a TSA and secondly, to explore whether glenoid component radiolucency is associated with glenoid position, clinical outcomes and patient-reported measures in the short-term (two year) follow-up period. Methods: This study was a sub-study of a larger clinical trial that included patients who underwent a TSA and who were randomized into two different glenoid types with a minimum two-year follow-up period. Post-operative radiographic assessments (six weeks and two years) were used to measure glenoid component position (version, inclination, offset) and humeral head centering anterior–posterior (AP) and superior–inferior (SI), and to assess glenoid component radiolucent scoring (modified Lazarus). Pre-operative X-rays were used to measure glenoid version, inclination and Walch classification. Patient-reported measures (PROMs) included the EQ-5D health slider and the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis (WOOS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and were captured at baseline and two years postoperative. Clinical outcomes including range of motion and complications were also documented. Statistical analysis included t-tests and regression modeling. Results: Ninety-one patients with an average age of 69.9 ± 6.2 years were included in this study. Glenoid component position improved significantly in version (−19.4 ± 8.6° to −17.7 ± 8.5°; p < 0.045) and inclination (11.5 ± 7.1° to 5.9 ± 6.3°; p < 0.00001) from preoperative to six weeks postoperative. Glenoid component offset in SI and humeral head centering in AP remained unchanged throughout the follow-up. Radiolucency (Lazarus classification) was recorded in 21 cases (17.3%) with a Lazarus score of 1 (15 cases) and 2 (6 cases). The EQ-5D health slider, WOOS and ASES, and ROM confirmed continuous improvements from the preoperative scores to the two-year follow-up (p < 0.05). Regression models showed no correlation between glenoid component radiolucency at two years and the postoperative week six glenoid component position; however, female gender was a significant variable. Conclusion: Glenoid component changes from its original native glenoid were observed following TSA. Glenoid inclination was improved more than version from baseline, and the humeral head remained well-centered in AP and SI at two years. Radiolucency of the glenoid at two years is not negatively associated with PROMs or component position; however, female gender was identified as a significant predictor and warrants further investigation. Complications are not associated with glenoid position or radiolucency, but longer-term follow-up is required.