Survival after secondary liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: A comparative analysis of the LICC trial with historical controls (CELIM, FIRE-3).

Abstract

e15025 Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) with liver-limited disease (LLD) have a chance of long-term overall survival (OS) and potential cure after complete hepatic metastasectomy. The appropriate postoperative treatment strategy is still controversial. L-BLP25 as antigen-specific cancer vaccine targeting mucin 1 (MUC1) was recently evaluated as adjuvant therapy in mCRC pts after R0/R1 LLD resection (LICC trial, NCT01462513). Here we compared the LICC surveillance program and efficacy results for secondarily resected LLD pts versus historical controls, i.e. the CELIM trial (Folprecht et al, Ann Oncol 2014) of potentially resectable LLD mCRC pts and a FIRE-3-LLD subgroup (Holch et al, Int J Cancer 2018). Methods: LICC, CELIM and FIRE-3-LLD subgroup pts with stage IV mCRC limited to liver metastases who underwent hepatic resection (R0 or R1) were compared regarding pts characteristics, surveillance and efficacy outcome. LICC pts received adjuvant L-BLP25 or placebo after secondary LLD resection as 8 weekly doses, followed by 6 week maintenance intervals and tight surveillance until recurrence or a maximum of 2 years. Results: In LICC, 41 /121 pts (33.9%) were secondarily resected, and R0 resection was achieved in 31 pts (75.6%). In CELIM, 36/106 pts (34%) with primary unresectable LLD were secondarily R0 resected. In FIRE-3-LLD, secondary resection was feasible for 29/133 pts (21.8%). After R0 resection, median recurrence free survival (mRFS) was 8.9 months in LICC, 9.9 months in CELIM and 11.5/ 12.4 months in FIRE-3-LLD in either treatment arm. In the LICC trial, median overall survival (mOS) in secondarily resected pts was 65.1 months, with 38.3 months for the R1 and is not yet reached for the R0 subgroup. In CELIM, mOS was 53.9 months for R0 resected pts. In FIRE-3-LLD, after secondary resection mOS was 56.2 months. Median age was about 5 years less in LICC. Further details will be presented. Conclusions: Secondary resected pts of LICC, CELIM and FIRE-3 showed impressive median OS with better OS for LICC and a younger patient cohort. The established tight LICC surveillance program after surgery might have had a positive impact on survival. Clinical trial information: LICC: NCT01462513; FIRE-3: NCT00433927; CELIM: NCT00153998.