Survey of sarcoma surgery principles among orthopaedic oncologists

Abstract

BackgroundSurgical principles and techniques used during primary sarcoma excision focus on acquiring negative margins, reducing the risk of local recurrence, and minimizing contamination. These principles and techniques within orthopaedic oncology are not well documented in the literature. No standardized surgical hand-off or approach to education across disciplines on orthopaedic oncology principles and techniques has been published. Currently, education on intraoperative approaches is passed down by oral tradition. ObjectivesOur objective was to survey members of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) to identify their core principles and practices in orthopaedic oncology. We aimed to 1) provide descriptive analyses of surgeon technique patterns; 2) determine correlations between individual practice patterns; and 3) identify distinct clusters of surgeons on the basis of common practice tendencies. MethodsA web-based, 16-question survey regarding orthopaedic oncology intraoperative principles and techniques was distributed online to all 349 members of the MSTS in 2021. There were 137 (39%) unique respondents, all of whom completed the entire survey. The 16 survey questions were grouped into 4 key aspects of sarcoma excision: pre-incision, exposure of the mass, delivery of the mass, and closure. The questions inquired about respondent preference on draping, back table setup, instrument use, and intraoperative decision making. These questions were selected on the basis of existing reports, as well as the senior author's experience. We analyzed the responses using 3 methods: 1) descriptive statistics, 2) correlations between question responses, and 3) clustering analysis. We used an artificial intelligence–based clustering algorithm to cluster respondents according to their practice patterns. The results of our correlation analyses are reported as Spearman's rho (ρ) correlation coefficients. ResultsMost respondents (mean, 71%; standard deviation, 22%) reported using the described surgical techniques “most of the time” or “in all cases.” A strong positive correlation was found between respondents who answered “yes” to both of the following questions: “Do you change your surgical gloves after passing off the tumor specimen?” and “Does your entire surgical team change their gloves after passing off the tumor specimen?” (ρ = 0.88). A moderate positive correlation was found between those who answered “yes” to both of the following questions: “Do you change your surgical gloves after passing off the tumor specimen (i.e., prior to closure)?” and “Do you use new and/or unused surgical instruments for the final closure?” (ρ = 0.60). The cluster analysis identified 3 distinct clusters of respondents. The conservative technique cluster (N = 42) was more likely to answer “yes” to 9 of the 10 questions regarding incision management, consultant team communication, gloving, and instrument use, whereas the permissive technique cluster (N = 41) was more likely to answer “no” to questions regarding gloving, draping, and instrument use. ConclusionsOur findings indicate that most respondents perform the surveyed techniques, and there is homogeneity in the practice patterns of members of the MSTS; however, we identified distinct clusters of respondents who were significantly more likely to perform certain techniques. These results support establishing a standardized set of intraoperative techniques and formal surgical education regarding intraoperative principles and techniques in orthopaedic oncology.