Abstract
Background:Cancer registry data can help plan for cancer services and to identify where further progress is needed, in order to improve the lives of patients with cancer. This study investigated the possibility of collecting additional information and the priority of the information by examining other cancer registry items. We aimed to suggest additional data items to be collected to enhance the usefulness of cancer registry data. Methods:We examined items that could potentially be added by comparing the cancer registration items in five foreign registries and large hospitals in Korea. Based on the foreign and domestic hospital cancer registry data, a questionnaire survey was administered to 272 cancer registry workers nationwide and 10 cancer experts to investigate the possibility of expanding the variables. The proportion and rank of each item were analyzed. Results:There were similar items for demographic information and cancer diagnosis between foreign cancer registries and the Korea Central Cancer Registry (KCCR). However, the KCCR had fewer items for staging, treatment, and follow-up. There were 29 items to be collected with high priority. Items under demographic information included date of birth, race and country of birth. Items for cancer diagnosis included type of cancer, smoking history and type of pathologic test. Treatment information included the date of treatment, chemotherapy and radiation. Items under the stage and prognostic factors included TNM stage, collaborative stage, and comorbidities. Finally, items under follow-up information included survival, cancer state and recurrence information. Conclusions:Cancer registration workers and cancer experts generally agreed on the need to expand the essential items for cancer registration. The findings of this study will be useful for devising plans to expand cancer registration items.
Highlights
Cancer registration is a method of systematically and continuously collecting cancer data, including demographic, diagnostic, treatment, and outcome information (Moore, 2013)
In addition to the cancer registry items submitted to the Korea Central Cancer Registry (KCCR) by five large hospitals in Korea, we investigated and compared additional items collected by these hospitals
After excluding “management information,” 26, 556, 79, and 52 items were collected from the KCCR, the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) (2013), the National Health Services (NHS), and the European Network of Cancer Registries (ENCR) (2015), respectively
Summary
Cancer registration is a method of systematically and continuously collecting cancer data, including demographic, diagnostic, treatment, and outcome information (Moore, 2013). Continuous efforts to expand the scope of registry and items are essential to addressing the limitations of the national cancer registry data and to increase their usefulness. To this end, the KCCR has added the stage variable according to the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) summary stage. This study investigated the possibility of collecting additional information and the priority of the information by examining other cancer registry items. Results: There were similar items for demographic information and cancer diagnosis between foreign cancer registries and the Korea Central Cancer Registry (KCCR). The findings of this study will be useful for devising plans to expand cancer registration items
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.