Abstract
Operative treatment of midclavicular fractures in patients older than 60 years poses an increased risk of fixation failure. Although plating of midclavicular fractures in the elderly is still a popular fixation method, osteopenic bone may result in plate loosening and fixation failure. The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of midclavicular fractures in patients older than 60 years who are treated with either a locking compression plate or nonlocking plate. Sixty-four elderly patients with midclavicular fractures were surgically treated with either a locking compression plate or nonlocking plate, which included dynamic compression plates and reconstruction plates. The locking compression plate group included 29 patients with an average age of 69.1 years. The nonlocking plate group included 35 patients with an average age of 66.3 years. Both groups were similar for age, gender, injury mechanism, fracture patterns, and confounding medical condition (P>.5). However, the locking compression plate group had lower complication rates compared to the nonlocking plate group (P=.087). In addition, the locking compression plate group had higher rates of return to work and exercise (P=.02, P=.016, respectively). If surgery of elderly patients with midclavicular fractures is indicated, internal fixation with a locking compression plate is preferable to a nonlocking plate.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
