Abstract
Aim“To evaluate oncological and surgical outcomes of different levels of tumor thrombus and tumor characteristics secondary to renal cell carcinoma (RCC)”.Materials and MethodsRetrospective review from 2013 to 2020 of 34 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy with thrombectomy for RCC with tumor thrombus extending into the inferior vena cava (IVC) and right atrium (RA) at our center. Level I and most level II tumors were removed using straight forward occluding maneuvers with control of the contralateral renal vein. None of the patients had level III tumor extensions in our study group. For level IV thrombus, a beating heart surgery using a simplified cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) technique was used for retrieval of thrombus from the right atrium.Results“ Of the 34 patients with thrombus”, 19 patients had level I, 12 patients had level II, none had level III, and three patients had level IV thrombus. Two patients required simplified CPB. Another patient with level IV thrombus CPB, was not attempted in view of refractory hypotension intraoperatively. Pathological evaluation showed clear-cell carcinoma in 67.64%, papillary carcinoma in 17.64%, chromophobe in 5.8%, and squamous cell carcinoma in 8.8% of cases. Left side thrombectomy was difficult surgically, whereas right side thrombectomy did not have any survival advantage. Mean blood loss during the procedure was 325 mL, ranging from 200 to 1000 mL, and mean operative time was 185 min, ranging from 215 to 345 min. The immediate postoperative mortality was 2.9%. Level I thrombus had better survival compared to level II thrombus.ConclusionRadical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy remains the mainstay of treatment in RCC with inferior venacaval extension. The surgical approach and outcome depends on primary tumor size, location, level of thrombus, local invasion of IVC, any hepato-renal dysfunction or any associated comorbidities. The higher the level of thrombus, the greater is the need for prior optimization and the adoption of a multidisciplinary approach for a successful surgical outcome.
Highlights
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is responsible for 2–3% of all adult malignancies and is one of the fatal tumors of the renal system
A striking and significant feature of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) lies in its tendency to grow intraluminally into the renal venous system in a cranial direction known as venous tumor thrombosis
It was a retrospective study in which all patients with a diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with tumor thrombus extension into the inferior vena cava (IVC) and right atrium (RA) were enrolled
Summary
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is responsible for 2–3% of all adult malignancies and is one of the fatal tumors of the renal system. A striking and significant feature of RCC lies in its tendency to grow intraluminally into the renal venous system in a cranial direction known as venous tumor thrombosis. The growth may extend till the right atrium (RA) or beyond. This growth of RCC into the renal venous system has been observed among 4–10% of the patients. With frequent use of ultrasonography, the diagnosis of RCC with venous involvement has steadily increased even in asymptomatic cases [2]. 45–70% of the patients with venous tumor thrombosis can be successfully treated by nephrectomy combined with thrombectomy. Among patients with a primary diagnosis of renal mass, the presence of lower extremity edema, dilated superficial abdominal veins, proteinuria, pulmonary embolism, isolated right-sided varicocele, and right atrial mass raises the suspicion of renocaval tumor extension. A multidisciplinary approach is required for the management of these patients, and it is a challenging scenario for the uro-oncologist
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.