Abstract
Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive disease linked to asbestos exposure, presenting significant treatment challenges. The recommended approach is multimodal treatment, even if the concept of resectable PM and the superiority of one surgical technique over the other [(extended) pleurectomy decortication [(E)PD] vs extra-pleural pneumonectomy (EPP)] are matter of debates. The aim of this study is to compare the two techniques in terms of short- and long-term outcomes at a high-volume center. Clinical data from PM patients who underwent radical surgery [(E)PD and EPP] between 1994 and 2022 were collected. A propensity score weighting approach was used for non-random intervention allocation. Survival distribution was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and the association with outcomes was evaluated using a weighted Cox Proportional Hazard Models. Among 254 patients, 125 (49%) underwent EPP and 129 (51%) (E)PD. The 90-day mortality was higher in the EPP group (7.2% vs 0%; p = 0.01). No difference in 1-,3- and 5-year survival was found: 65.8%, 26%, 17% for EPP and 75.5%, 39.7% and 21.3% for (E)PD; p = 0.39). The multivariable weighted Cox model identified no increased risk of death (HR 1.25; p = 0.49) or recurrence (HR 1.05; p = 0.858) in the EPP group. Pre-operative total lung capacity (TLC) was significantly associated with a reduced risk of death (HR 0.96; p = 0.023) and recurrence (HR 0.97; p = 0.019) at follow-up while preoperative disease burden to a higher risk of recurrence (HR 1.01; p = 0.02). Our experience showed acceptable short- and long-term outcomes in both procedures, making EPP still an option only for carefully selected patients at high volume center. Surgery, although recently debated, should be performed exclusively in expert centers to minimize post-operative risks. The identification of new prognostic factors is crucial for better selecting patients who may benefit from surgery within the context of multimodal treatment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.