Abstract

Using an ab initio pseudopotential approach, we have studied the ionization potential of several surfaces of GaAs, with different orientation, reconstruction, and stoichiometry. In particular, we have examined the As-rich (100) $c\ensuremath{-}(4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}4),$ $(2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}4)2\ensuremath{\beta},$ and $(2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}4)\ensuremath{\beta}$ surfaces, the Ga-rich (100) $(4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2)2\ensuremath{\beta}$ and $(4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2)\ensuremath{\zeta}$ surfaces, as well as the (110) surface. The calculated variations of the ionization potential with surface morphology are as large as 0.7 eV. The largest ionization potential (5.70 eV) occurs for the As-rich $(2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}4)\ensuremath{\beta}$ surface, and the smallest (5.00 eV) for the Ga-rich $(4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2)2\ensuremath{\beta}$ one. The results are compared with available experimental data, and are explained in terms of a model based on a superposition of neutral bulk charge-density units, carrying neither dipole nor quadrupole, and charge transfers between the units dictated by the electron counting rule.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.