Surface Currents and Relative-Wind Stress in Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Simulations of the Northern California Current System

Abstract

Abstract The dependence of surface-current damping on the definition of surface current for the relative wind is examined in coupled ocean–atmosphere numerical simulations of the northern California Current System (nCCS) during March–October 2009. The model response is analyzed for wind stress computed from relative wind for six different choices of effective model surface velocity. Simulations without surface-current coupling are also considered. As a function of the geographically varying uppermost grid-level depth, the model uppermost grid-level velocity is found to have a wind-drift component with a log-layer structure. Mean geostrophic wind work is concentrated in the shelf and slope regions during March–May (MAM) and in the deep offshore region in June–September (JJAS). The surface-current damping effect on ocean kinetic energy depends more strongly on the parameterization of atmospheric planetary boundary layer (PBL) turbulence than on the surface-current coupling formulation: weaker PBL mixing gives stronger surface-current damping. The damping effect is stronger in the less energetic offshore region than in the more energetic region closer to the coast. During MAM, the changes in kinetic energy and geostrophic wind work in the shelf and slope regions are spatially correlated, while during JJAS, the changes in geostrophic wind work are strongly modulated by SST–stress coupling. The wind-drift-corrected surface-current formulations result in large changes in the effective wind work based on the product of stress and relative-wind surface current but result in only small changes in the kinetic energy of the circulation. Significance Statement Ocean currents and atmospheric winds are coupled by the exchange of momentum across the air–sea interface, the strength of which depends on the relative wind, the difference between the surface wind and surface current. The purpose of this work was to examine the dependence of a coupled ocean–atmosphere model of the northern California Current System (nCCS) on the representations of the relative-wind surface current and turbulent mixing in the lower atmosphere. The model surface current was found to have a shallow wind-drift response. The model ocean circulation was driven primarily by near-coast winds during the spring and by offshore winds during the summer. The ocean response depended more strongly on the atmospheric turbulent mixing than on the surface current representation.