Abstract

Polemic of K.-O. Apel against H.-G. Gadamers philosophical hermeneutics moots the question about the difference between ontological and methodological approaches to the phenomenon of understanding. This problem is treated in the paper on the ground of the analysis of the role of subjectivity in the communicative and hermeneutical models of the two thinkers. The results is the contrast between the pragmatic “regulative idea” of the total subjectivity in Apel and the ontological destruction of subjectivity in Gadamer. The author assumes that it can contribute to the demarcation between pragmaticmethodological and ontological strategies in hermeneutics.

Highlights

  • Gadamers philosophical hermeneutics moots the question about the difference between ontological and methodological approaches to the phenomenon of understand­ ing. This problem is treated in the paper on the ground of the analysis of the role of subjectivity in the communicative and hermeneutical models of the two thinkers

  • The results is the contrast between the pragmatic "regulative idea" of the total subjectivity in Apel and the ontological destruction of subjectiv­ ity in Gadamer

  • The author assumes that it can contribute to the demarcation between pragmatic­ methodological and ontological strategies in hermeneutics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

HIO H T.D.), T.e. Kor,n;a ,!J;HCTaHIJ;HH MeJK;Jzy ero CMbICJIOBbIMH HHTeHIJ;HHMH H ropH30HTOM uamero IlOHHMa­ HHH ue MO:x

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.