Abstract

The heavy meson-antimeson pairs, where one is an excited $(\frac{3}{2}{)}^{+}$ meson and the other is a ground state $(\frac{1}{2}{)}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ meson, namely, the pairs (${D}_{1}(2420)\overline{D}+\mathrm{c}.\mathrm{c}.$), (${D}_{1}(2420){\overline{D}}^{*}+\mathrm{c}.\mathrm{c}.$), (${D}_{2}(2460){\overline{D}}^{*}+\mathrm{c}.\mathrm{c}.$) in the charm sector and (${B}_{1}(5721)\overline{B}+\mathrm{c}.\mathrm{c}.$), (${B}_{1}(5721){\overline{B}}^{*}+\mathrm{c}.\mathrm{c}.$), (${B}_{2}(5747){\overline{B}}^{*}+\mathrm{c}.\mathrm{c}.$) in the bottom sector, are allowed, by the quantum numbers, to be produced in the $S$ wave in ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ annihilation. We show, however, that such $S$-wave production is forbidden by the heavy quark spin symmetry. Thus, the yield of the considered meson pairs in ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ annihilation should be significantly suppressed near the respective thresholds. In our view, this substantially weakens the arguments for considering the $Y(4260)$ charmoniumlike resonance as a ${D}_{1}\overline{D}$ molecular state.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.