Abstract
Sixty supervisor-subordinate pairs were sampled before and after annual performance appraisal interviews used to discuss the subordinates' goal accomplishments over the past 12 months. The pairs were randomly selected from exempt employees of an industry headquartered in the Northwest. The data showed little agreement between superiors and their subordinates on preappraisal conditions of interest but moderate agreement on the affective orientation of the interview, objective qualities of it, and the nature of subordinate performance. However, in spite of the agreement across pairs on the pattern of performance discussions (reflected by supervisor-subordinate correlations), they did not agree on the level of performance; mean differences between the groups still existed after the sessions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
