Abstract
Objectives To compare the success rate of calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) pulpotomies in primary molars restored with a stainless steel crown (SSC) to that of teeth restored with amalgam and to evaluate the role of restoration failure in treatment outcome. Study design Pulpotomies were performed in 154 primary molars. Teeth were grouped according to pulpal exposure type as either mechanically or cariously exposed, with cariously exposed teeth further divided according to size of exposure site (pinpoint or larger than pinpoint). Seventy teeth were restored with amalgam and 84 with a SSC. Teeth were followed up for 12 months. Results Pulpotomy success rates were 79.9% for teeth restored with a SSC and 60% for those restored with amalgam. The difference between these rates was statistically significant (p 0.05). Conclusions The pulpotomy success rate for teeth restored with a SSC was higher than for those restored with amalgam. Restoration failure did not appear to have an effect on treatment prognosis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
