Suitability of commonly used excipients for electrophysiological in-vitro safety pharmacology assessment of effects on hERG potassium current and on rabbit Purkinje fiber action potential

Abstract

Introduction: Regulatory guidelines require investigation of the liability for delayed ventricular repolarization by new chemical entities within a broad concentration range in-vitro. However, investigation can be limited by poor drug aqueous solubility, and by solvent physicochemical attributes that disrupt cell membrane integrity. Although excipients or solubilizing agents may aid to achieve the necessary high concentrations, no comprehensive overview on the suitability of solvents for in-vitro electrophysiological safety studies exists. Methods: Excipients were tested for potential interference with the hERG (human ether-a-go-go-related gene) K + current (whole-cell voltage-clamp, 23 ± 2 °C), and the shape of rabbit Purkinje fiber action potentials (conventional glass microelectrode technique, 37 ± 1 °C). Results and discussion: Water-soluble complexation builders/carriers had little effect on hERG K + current at up to 50 mg/ml (BSA, bovine serum albumin) and 11 mg/ml (HP-β-CD, hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin; IC 20, concentration of 20% inhibition). Water-soluble organic (co)solvents inhibited hERG K + currents (IC 20, %/mM): 0.7/152, ethanol; 0.9/67, Transcutol; 1.2/154, DMSO (dimethylsulfoxide); 1.6/389, acetonitrile; 1.9/48, polyethylene glycol 400; 2.1/660, methanol. Part of their inhibitory effect is attributed to the osmolality of extracellular solutions, because hERG IC 20 and extrapolated osmolality at the hERG IC 20 strongly correlate. Water-soluble non-ionic solubilizers/surfactants are potent inhibitors of hERG K + current with IC 20 concentrations of 0.07% (Cremophor EL) or lower (Tween 20, Tween 80: ∼ 0.001%). Part of this inhibitory effect is attributed to their interaction with lipid membranes, because hERG inhibition occurs close to critical micelle concentrations (Cremophor, ∼ 0.009%; Tween 20, ∼ 0.007%). Purkinje fiber action potentials are little affected by HP-β-CD at up to 2 mg/ml, while DMSO tends to shorten the action potential duration at 1%. Conclusion: When conducting electrophysiological in-vitro assessments of drug effects, solubilizers/surfactants (Cremophor EL, Tween 20, Tween 80) should be avoided. Instead, water-soluble organic (co)solvents (methanol, acetonitrile, DMSO) or complexation builders/carriers (HP-β-CD, BSA) appear to be more favorable.