Suicide Research, Prevention, and COVID-19.

The suicidal process is a complex phenomenon involving multiple intertwined factors, which makes its prevention particularly challenging. As evidence-based suicide prevention interventions evolve and consolidate, it becomes increasingly important to ensure that effective interventions are efficiently implemented in practice and translated into the quality programs and care that benefit people at risk of suicidal behavior.

A Global Call for Action to Prioritize Healthcare Worker Suicide Prevention During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond.

A Public Health, Whole-of-Government Approach to National Suicide Prevention Strategies

Suicide Prevention in an International Context.

At the American Association of Suicidology’s (AAS) 46th Annual Conference in Austin, Texas (http://www.suicidology.org/web/guest/education-and-training/annualconference), participants were challenged to address why there has not been more progress in reducing the rates of completed suicides (Berman, 2013). A draft of recommendations from the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention’s Research Prioritization Task Force was presented at the meeting and subsequently published in this journal (National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention [NAASP], 2013a, 2013b). The purpose of this commentary is to address this challenge by emphasizing the importance of employing a disease etiology strategy that integrates molecular data with clinical data, environmental data, and health outcomes in a dynamic, iterative fashion. The recommendations of the Research Prioritization Task Force tackle important public health program issues and are embedded within seven key questions, summarized as: 1. Why do people become suicidal? 2. How do we better detect/predict risk? 3. What interventions prevent suicidal behavior? 4. What are the effective services for treating suicidal persons and preventing suicidal behavior? 5. How do we reduce stigma? 6. What are the suicide prevention interventions outside of health-care settings? 7. Which existing and new infrastructure needs are required to further reduce suicidal behavior? (NAASP, 2013b; Silverman et al., 2013)

Are we studying the right populations to understand suicide?

Suicide research and prevention in developing countries in Asia and the Pacific

In this editorial, we discuss how mobile phone technology has the potential to move the field forward in terms of understanding suicide risk as well as laying foundations for the development of effective treatments/interventions. We have focused on mobile health technology given the rapid growth of mobile health approaches in suicide prevention (De Jaegere & Portzky, 2014; Mishara & Kerkhof, 2013) and psychological research more generally (Myin-Germeys et al., 2009; Nock, Prinstein, & Sterba, 2009; Palmier-Claus et al., 2011) and because mobile phone use is ubiquitous, with 75% of the world having access to a mobile phone (Kay, 2011). (aut. ref.)

News, Announcements, and IASP

Each year approximately 1,000,000 people die by suicide, accounting for nearly 3% of all deaths and more than half (56%) of all violent deaths in the world (Krug, Dahlberg, Mercy, Zwi, & Lozano, 2002). Suicide ideation and suicide attempts are strongly linked to death by suicide and powerfully predict further suicidal behavior (Institute of Medicine, 2002). There are an estimated 100–200 suicide attempts for each completed suicide in young people, and 4 attempts for each completed suicide in the elderly (Institute of Medicine, 2002). Emergency departments (EDs) are the most important site, epidemiologically speaking, for treating those who make suicide attempts. EDs in the United States, for example, record over 500,000 suicide-related visits annually (Larkin, Smith, & Beautrais, 2008). The majority of suicide attempt patients are discharged after medical stabilization and psychosocial evaluation, but carry a significant risk of recidivism (Larkin, Smith, & Beautrais, 2008). Similarly, ED patients who present with suicide ideation (without attempt) have risks of returning to the ED with further ideation or with suicide attempts which are as high as those who present with attempts (Larkin, Beautrais, Gibb, & Laing, 2008). In addition, a significant fraction of those who present to EDs for nonmental health reasons often have occult or silent suicide ideation (estimated at 8–12%) (Claassen & Larkin, 2005). The worldwide economic tsunami and sky-rocketing healthcare costs have ensured that mental health-related visits and presentations for suicidal behavior will continue to rise in the foreseeable future. The closure of psychiatric inpatient facilities, reductions in inpatient beds, moves to treat people in the community, and increased costs of general practitioner visits have coincided with – and likely account for – increased ED attendances by psychiatric and suicidal patients who previously might have been admitted or seen in primary care. The ED is now the default, de facto option for urgent and acute contact for suicidal patients within the health system – and in many countries the ED is the only access to 24/7 healthcare (Fields et al., 2001).

Suicide Prevention Across Countries and Continents: Lessons Learned

The World Health Organization's report on suicide: a fundamental step in worldwide suicide prevention.

Suicide research and prevention: we need new, innovative approaches.

Advancing Suicide Research

The Acceptability of Suicide Among Rural Residents, Urban Residents, and College Students from Three Locations in China