Abstract

Hilary of Poitiers’s discussion of Christ’s human experience and suffering in De trinitate has caused immense problems for modern interpreters, who often accuse him of docetic tendencies. The focus on docetism has silenced the true significance of Hilary’s argument. His view of Christ’s human experience actually serves to enhance, not diminish or deny, the reality of Christ’s humanity. Stoic psychological categories allow Hilary to speak of Christ’s suffering without pain as legitimately human, and Hilary’s christological framework enables his discussion of Christ’s experience to have immense implications for all humanity, developing an anthropology based upon the lived experience of Christ.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.