Abstract

BackgroundThe efficacy of glucagon for adrenaline-resistant anaphylactic shock in patients taking β-blockers is controversial. However, understanding the efficacy of glucagon is important because adrenaline-resistant anaphylactic shock is fatal. We present a case of severe adrenaline-resistant anaphylactic shock in a patient taking a β-blocker, and glucagon was effective in improving hemodynamics.Case presentationAn 88-year-old woman with severe aortic stenosis and taking a selective β-1 blocker underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation under general anesthesia. Postoperatively, she received 100 mg sugammadex, but 2 min later developed severe hypotension and bronchospasm. Suspecting anaphylactic shock, we intervened by administering adrenaline, fluid loading, and an increased noradrenaline dose. Consequently, the bronchospasm improved, but her blood pressure only increased minimally. Therefore, we administered 1 mg glucagon intravenously, and the hypotension resolved immediately.ConclusionsGlucagon may improve hemodynamics in adrenaline-resistant anaphylactic shock patients taking β-blockers; however, its efficacy must be further evaluated in more cases.

Highlights

  • The efficacy of glucagon for adrenaline-resistant anaphylactic shock in patients taking β-blockers is controversial

  • Glucagon may improve hemodynamics in adrenaline-resistant anaphylactic shock patients taking β-blockers; its efficacy must be further evaluated in more cases

  • Glucagon may be effective in improving hemodynamics in patients taking β-blockers regularly [3, 4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The efficacy of glucagon for adrenaline-resistant anaphylactic shock in patients taking β-blockers is controversial. Conclusions: Glucagon may improve hemodynamics in adrenaline-resistant anaphylactic shock patients taking β-blockers; its efficacy must be further evaluated in more cases. Background adrenaline is the first-line treatment for anaphylactic shock, its efficacy may be limited in patients taking β-blockers regularly [1].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.