Successful Ablation of Incessant Narrow-QRS Ventricular Tachycardia Involving the His–Purkinje System: Insights from Manifest Entrainment

High-power bipolar ablation for incessant ventricular tachycardia utilizing a deep midmyocardial septal circuit

Options for ventricular tachycardia ablation after double valve replacement

Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important cause of morbidity and sudden death in patients with heart disease.1 Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) terminate VT episodes, reducing the risk of sudden death. Recurrent VT develops in 40% to 60% of patients who receive an ICD after an episode of spontaneous sustained VT. A first episode of VT occurs in ≈20% of patients within 3 to 5 years after ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden death in high-risk groups.2–4 ICD shocks reduce quality of life and are associated with an increased risk of death.2–4 Antiarrhythmic drug therapy with amiodarone or sotalol reduces VT episodes but with disappointing incidence of side effects and efficacy.2 Catheter ablation is useful for reducing VT episodes and can be life-saving when VT is incessant.1,5,6 Idiopathic VTs occur in patients without structural heart disease and rarely cause sudden death. Electrophysiological study with catheter ablation is often warranted to confirm the diagnosis, to provide further evidence for the absence of ventricular scar or other disease, and often to cure the arrhythmia. Ablation is also an option for symptomatic nonsustained VT and frequent ventricular ectopy in these patients.1 The appearance of the VT on ECG often suggests its likely cause and associated heart disease (Figure 1). Monomorphic VT has the same QRS complex from beat to beat, indicating repetitive ventricular activation from a structural substrate or focus that can be targeted for ablation. Most are due to reentry through regions of ventricular scar.7 Figure 1. ECG types of VT and most common causes are shown with characteristic ECG features of selected VTs. LBBB indicates left bundle-branch block; LVOT, LV outflow tract; RBBB, right bundle-branch block; L, left; and R, right. Polymorphic VTs have a changing ventricular activation sequence that can be due to …

A case of incessant VT from an intramural septal focus: Ethanol or bipolar ablation?

Most idiopathic right ventricular tachycardias originate from the outflow tract. We present a case series of idiopathic incessant ventricular tachycardia arising from unusual sites of the right ventricle in children, which were well resolved by catheter ablation. A retrospective review was performed of all three patients who underwent ablation of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia below the level of the right ventricular outflow tract using three-dimensional mapping in our institute. Result All three patients presented with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy due to incessant ventricular tachycardia on first admission. The sites of successful ablation were at the proximal right bundle branch, distal right bundle branch, and apex of the right ventricle, respectively. No complications occurred, and there has been no recurrence of ventricular tachycardia after the final ablation at an average follow-up period of 9 months. All three patients have achieved normalisation of left ventricular size and systolic function. Incessant idiopathic ventricular tachycardia originating from unusual sites of the right ventricle in children, resulting in significant symptoms and impaired ventricular function, can be successfully treated with catheter ablation.

The feasibility of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation for the treatment of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with coronary artery disease and remote myocardial infarction has recently been demonstrated. At present, therapeutic options for VT in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) include antiarrhythmic drugs and implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICD). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of RF catheter ablation in patients with idiopathic DCM who could not be adequately treated by conventional treatment modalities because of incessant or frequent, recurrent VT. RF current application for ablation of 9 VTs (mean cycle length, 402 +/- 78 ms) was attempted in 8 patients with idiopathic DCM (4 men, 4 women; mean age, 54 +/- 6 years; mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 30 +/- 9%). Inclusion criteria for ablation were incessant VT (n = 4) or frequent, recurrent VT reproducibly inducible with programmed electrical stimulation (n = 5). Three patients had suffered aborted sudden cardiac death, and 2 had experienced syncope. Two patients were artificially ventilated and catecholamine dependent for hemodynamic reasons at the time of attempted ablation. Potential target sites for RF current application were identified by detailed endocardial mapping during sinus rhythm, activation and entrainment mapping during VT, and pace mapping. After 7 +/- 5 RF pulses (range, 2 to 18 pulses; median, 6 pulses) applied with 32 +/- 7 W for 39 +/- 9 seconds, 6 of the 9 target VTs (67%) were rendered noninducible (4 of 4 incessant VTs and 2 of 5 chronic recurrent VTs). In 6 patients, VTs with ECG morphologies other than the target VTs were inducible after RF catheter ablation. Seven patients were on antiarrhythmic drugs during the ablation procedure and during the follow-up period of 8 +/- 5 months (range, 2 to 17 months). One patient received an ICD before RF ablation, 4 patients after RF ablation, and 1 patient after ablation of an incessant VT and before attempted ablation of frequent, recurrent VTs. One patient underwent heart transplantation 5 months after ablation in end-stage heart failure. There were no acute complications during the mapping and ablation procedure. During the follow-up period, 1 patient had been resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation 6 weeks after ablation and finally died of congestive heart failure 2 weeks later. No further episodes of incessant VT occurred in the patients who had undergone RF current application for ablation of incessant VT. A complete prevention of VT could be achieved in 2 of 8 patients, whereas in 5 patients, VT episodes were stored in the ICD devices during follow-up. The results of the present study indicate that RF current application for ablation of VT in a select group of patients with idiopathic DCM is feasible. The efficacy of RF ablation may be high in patients presenting with incessant VT, whereas the success rate seems to be only moderate in patients with chronic recurrent VT. In all patients, additional treatment options, including antiarrhythmic drugs, ICDs, and/or heart transplantation, were applied after RF ablation, indicating that RF ablation for this indication may be an adjunctive and not a curative treatment option.

Epicardial only mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a case series.

Ventricular tachycardias (VT), shocks, and clusters of shock are ominous signs in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and herald an increased risk of hospitalization and mortality. VT clusters have been associated with aggravation of heart failure (19%), acute coronary events (14%), and electrolyte imbalance (10%). Yet, any association of potential causative factors and aggravation of VT is vague. Maybe, in patients with any substrate for re-entry, progressive aggravation of ventricular dysrhythmias is to be expected. The high recurrence rate of electrical storm despite antiarrhythmic drug therapy supports this view. The optimal timing of VT ablation is unknown, but current convention is to perform VT ablation after shock clusters or incessant VT has occurred. Preemptive VT ablation before VT has occurred is rarely performed (only in 15% of active centers) and the majority of centers never perform VT ablation even after the first shock. Such practice is within guidelines that recommend VT ablation only in ICD patients with recurrent or incessant VT. However, there is strong data in support of preemptive VT ablation.

Structure and function of the ventricular tachycardia isthmus.

Incessant monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) with a right bundle branch block morphology and a northwest axis is a rare arrhythmic complication in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and apical left ventricular aneurysm. The origin of this VT was localized using the following criteria: the presence of entrainment without fusion, equal intervals from the stimulus to the beginning of the QRS complex and from the electrogram to the QRS complex during VT, and the first postpacing interval identical to the tachycardia cycle length. Radiofrequency energy applied to the septoapical part of the apical left ventricular aneurysm terminated the tachycardia within 2 seconds. Using criteria to guide radiofrequency (RF) ablation of VT in patients with coronary artery disease, an incessant monomorphic VT in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was successfully ablated.

Ventricular arrhythmia inducibility is one of the ideal endpoints of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. However, it may be challenging to implement programmed electrical stimulation (PES) at the end of the procedure under several circumstances. The long-term outcome of patients who did not undergo PES after VT ablation remains largely unknown. To investigate the details and long-term outcome of VT ablation in patients who did not undergo PES at the end of the ablation procedure. Among 183 VT ablation procedures in patients with structural heart disease who underwent VT ablation using an irrigated catheter, we enrolled those who did not undergo PES after VT ablation. VT ablation strategy involved targeting clinical VT plus pacemap-guided substrate ablation if inducible. When VT was not inducible, substrate-based ablation was performed. The primary endpoint was VT recurrence. In 58 procedures, post-ablation VT inducibility was not assessed. The causes were non-inducibility of sustained VT before ablation (27/58, 46.6%), long procedure time (27.6%, mean 392min), complications (10.3%), intolerant hemodynamic state (10.3%), and inaccessible or unsafe target (6.9%). With regard to the primary endpoint, 23 recurrences (39.7%) were observed during a mean follow-up period of 2.5years. Patients with non-inducibility before ablation showed less VT recurrences (4/27, 14.8%) during follow-up than patients with other causes of untested PES after ablation (19/31, 61.2%) (Log-rank < 0.001). VT recurrence was not observed in approximately 60% of the patients who did not undergo PES at the end of the ablation procedure. PES after VT ablation may be not needed among patients with pre-ablation non-inducibility.

Catheter ablation is the primary treatment option for idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT). It plays a key role in acute therapy of electrical storm, treatment of VTs in patients with structural heart disease (SHD), and can reduce VT burden. Here we report on 10-year clinical outcomes following VT ablation from patients enrolled in the prospective German Ablation Registry. Long-term follow-up was conducted on 334 patients undergoing VT ablation (118/334, 35%) with structurally normal hearts and 216 out of 334 (65%) with SHD, including 161 out of 216 (75%) with ischemic heart disease at 38 centers. Follow-up was completed in 94.8% of patients. Median observation time was 10.8 (4.3-12.3) years, with a 10-year all-cause mortality rate of 39.4%. VT ablation in patients with SHD was associated with worse outcome when compared with patients with structurally normal hearts (estimated 10-year mortality for SHD 54.8% versus structurally normal hearts 12.1%). Estimated 10-year mortality following VT ablation was highest in patients with ischemic heart disease (62.4%). Significant predictors of mortality following VT ablation included age (hazard ratio [HR], 2.35 [1.90-2.92] per decade), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30% (HR, 2.11 [1.44-3.10]), diabetes (HR, 1.73 [1.14-2.61]), incessant VT (HR, 2.96 [1.74-5.03]), linear lesion (HR, 1.46 [0.99-2.16]), and acute procedural failure (HR, 2.57 [1.39-4.77]). Procedural failure was the only statistically significant predictor for VT recurrence during follow-up (HR, 3.76 [1.59-8.91]). Within an all-comer patient cohort, estimated 10-year all-cause mortality following VT ablation is 39.4%. Mortality after VT ablation is worse in patients with SHD and highest for patients with ischemic heart disease. Acute procedural success plays a major role in predicting VT recurrence and long-term mortality.

Endobronchial ultrasound–guided transtracheal cardiac plexus neuromodulation for refractory ventricular tachycardia

Electroanatomical mapping–guided stereotactic radiotherapy for right ventricular tachycardia storm

Early vs. delayed vt ablation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy