Abstract

This paper carries out studies on the Model-Free Implied Volatility (MF-IV) and other two competing volatility measurements including Black-Scholes Implied Volatility (BS-IV) and GARCH (1,1) with respect to forecasting error and information content. It is known that MF-IV is a volatility measurement independent of any option pricing model and it provides a direct test on market efficiency. The study introduces data of Hang Seng Index Call Options over two different forecasting horizons to compare the forecasting performance. The empirical results indicate that MF-IV contains richer information content than BS-IV over both monthly and bi-monthly forecasting horizons. However, MF-IV has better predictive accuracy in monthly forecasting horizon, while BS-IV performs better over bi-monthly forecasting horizon.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.