Abstract

Active and collaborative learning can be facilitated in large lectures through structured and well-planned interventions such as small group work (Felder, 1997). This may be an effective strategy as it encourages students to become more critical and responsible in their learning. However, students may not prefer this method or view it as useful, which could lead to hostility and obstruction of the methodology. This report details an evaluation of student perceptions of two lecture approaches: traditional lecturing and lectures using ‘small group’ work. Students preferred the ‘small group’ work and perceived it to be useful to their learning. Themes that emerged from the analysis complemented social constructivist literature.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.