Students Creating Art to Develop Advocacy Skills and Strengthen University Campus Tobacco Policy: A Focus Group Study

Position Statement on Tobacco Exposures in Children and Families

ObjectiveTo examine community engagement as a means to strengthentobacco-related policies and programs use in marginalizedpopulations.IntroductionAlthough significant progress has been made in tobacco control inthe United States (US) over the past 50 years, more than 15% of thepopulation currently use tobacco products.1Tobacco use continuesto be the leading cause of preventable death, contributing to over480,000 deaths and about $300 billion in economic costs each year.To achieve theHealthy People 2020(HP2020) objective of 12%national adult smoking rate by 2020, it is important to focus ourtobacco control efforts on surveillance and addressing disparitiesin tobacco use prevalence and tobacco-induced diseases acrossdifferent subpopulations and geographic areas.2Utah reportedthe lowest prevalence rate (9.7% in 2014), while rates as high as28% were identified in central Appalachia. Modern epidemiologyis limited in its ability to explain patterns of tobacco use andtobacco-related interventions and policies in these highly prevalent,marginalized environments. Therefore, a combination of quantitativeand community-based participatory research (CBPR), as proposedin Public Health 3.0, will expand the scope and reach to addressall factors of tobacco use, including cross-sector collaboration andmulti-level actions.3This study aimed to comprehensively investigatecounties in the Northeast Tennessee region where tobacco useprevalence is disproportionately highest, and to identify regionaland culturally specific evidence-based practices for tobacco control.Additionally, the study examined how these practices can be scaledup to address similar high tobacco use and disadvantaged populationselsewhere in the US and worldwide.MethodsGrounded by the CBPR framework, a mixed-methods approachtriangulated multiple sources of data using a three-prong assemblageofProtection,Prevention, andCessation, to develop tobaccocontrol recommendations and goals as part of a Population HealthImprovement Plan for Tennessee. Information gained from healthcouncil discussions, focus groups, interviews, and stakeholdermeetings were combined with quantitative analyses of secondarydata from Tennessee Department of Health, school-based surveys,and qualitative analyses conducted for descriptive and inferentialstatistics. All discussions and interviews involving 222 individualsfrom 91 organizations were recorded and organized using NVivo10, thematically coded using grounded theory, and analyzed usingdescriptive statistics. The results utilized aggregated themes generatedfrom the data.ResultsTobacco use in the Northeast Tennessee region comprises cigarettesmoking and smokeless tobacco, with increasing uptake of electroniccigarettes across all age groups. Among others, culture of tobaccouse and cultivation was identified as the most salient factor fortobacco use. Reducing tobacco use requires a foundation built oninformatics, community engagement, and a model for sustainablefunding to support infrastructure and program interventions. Whilestate and national policies and programs have received less attentionin this region, several effective community-based policies andprograms to prevent tobacco use were identified, including incentiveprograms such as Baby and Me, voluntary smoke-free campuspolicies by businesses and colleges, 100% screening programs byhospitals, and nicotine-free employee population. Overall, a total of25 recommendations were identified, with 14 aimed at protection,four at prevention, and seven at cessation. These recommendationsculminated into five overarching goals:Protectthe population fromtobacco and secondhand smoke exposure through policy enforcementand implementation and counter-marketing;Preventinitiation oftobacco use with comprehensive youth-focused programs that increaseknowledge and awareness;Expandaccess to cessation resources andtreatment, especially in high risk populations;Fostercollaborationand partnership; andMonitordata for evaluation and validity.ConclusionsThis is one of the few comprehensive attempts to address the socialdynamics of tobacco use and identify population and geographicpolicies and programs in highly prevalent communities. Amongthe myriad issues identified, the expansion of surveillance data toinform tobacco policy and culturally-tailored tobacco policies andprograms are essential to reduce tobacco use in population subgroups.Combining CBPR with actionable data can spur innovations inlocal efforts, highlight social determinants of health, and contributeto evidence-based policy. While the results of this study primarilyprovide in-depth descriptions of central Appalachia’s tobacco-relatedrisks and their perceptions of and reactions to tobacco preventionintervention, the policies and programs identified through the processmay be more readily adopted and scaled-up to address the disparitiesin tobacco use and tobacco-induced diseases, particularly pertainingto low-income, disadvantaged, and hard-to-reach populations.

The Tobacco Endgame-Eradicating a Worsening Epidemic: A Joint Opinion From the American Heart Association, World Heart Federation, American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology.

Examine tobacco and alcohol use patterns in a cohort of patients at their first (FE) or consecutive (CE) admission to a cardiology ward, and trajectories of use between groups over time. Tobacco and alcohol use was assessed at baseline and after one year on a prospective cohort of 249 patients admitted for CVD using the Timeline Followback method, and the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test. Trajectories within and between groups were analysed using generalized multilevel mixed-effect models for repeated measures. Baseline prevalence of FE tobacco use was 29.5% and 15.4% in CE. The mean of weekly cigarettes was 35.8 for FE and 30.2 for CE (n.s.). The study found a significant effect of time on the cessation (p < 0.001) and the reduction (p = 0.018) of tobacco use. FE demonstrated a greater reduction in tobacco use prevalence (p = 0.003) and quantity (p < 0.001) -positive interaction between group and time. Baseline prevalence of alcohol use was 63.8% and 41.9% on FE and CE. Although there was a reduction in the prevalence and quantity of alcohol use in both groups, it remained relatively high. Although the occurrence of a cardiovascular event has a significant impact on the reduction of tobacco use, alcohol use appears more resistant to change post-event.

Introduction: Young adults are a vulnerable population for experimentation with tobacco, which can lead to lifelong addiction. In an effort to ensure reductions in tobacco use through improved health promotion materials, we explored young adults’ perceptions of current Australian packaging warnings, and novel health warnings on individual cigarette sticks.Methods: Focus groups and interviews were conducted with smoking and non-smoking first-year undergraduate university students at a regional Australian university. Semi-structured questions were used to gather participant perceptions. Sixteen students participated across three focus groups, and eleven students participated in the phone interviews. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis in NVivo.Results: Six emergent themes were identified. Current cigarette packaging warnings were seen as ineffective, being disregarded by current smokers (theme 1), and seen as irrelevant by young adult smokers and non-smokers (theme 2). Several cigarette stick warnings were perceived as engaging and effective, due to the novelty of the cigarette stick as a medium (theme 3), and the proximal nature of the warnings used (theme 4). The warning depicting the financial consequences of smoking was considered the most effective, followed by the impact of smoking on personal appearance, and the “minutes of life lost” warning. Social media (theme 5), and the use of more supportive messages to assist smokers (theme 6) were considered the best next steps as tobacco control interventions.Conclusions: Supplementing packaging warnings which were seen as minimally effective in this study, using cigarette stick warnings and social media may lead to further reductions in tobacco use. New and relatable warnings such as the financial consequences of smoking and impact on personal appearance may be the most effective in dissuading young adults from smoking, particularly within the university environment.

BackgroundAssisting smoking parents to quit smoking and eliminating the secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure of their children is a global health priority. Engaging healthcare workers in developing countries to address this priority has been a challenge. This study intends to explore issues around current practice related to SHS exposure assessment and counseling and identify barriers to SHS exposure reduction counseling in the Chinese pediatric setting.MethodsWe conducted qualitative interviews (11 focus groups discussions (FGDs) with pediatricians, 6 FGDs with pediatric nurses and 11 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with hospital administrators) among 101 health-care professionals (HCP) from 5 hospitals in four major cities of Guangxi Province, China. All FGDs/ IDIs were audio recorded and analysed thematically.ResultsThe findings suggest that few Chinese pediatricians routinely address the SHS exposure of children in their usual practice. All HCPs felt the need for clinical interventions to promote SHS exposure reduction for children. Primary barriers to SHS exposure reduction counseling in the Chinese pediatric setting included: lack of skills and training in tobacco use reduction and cessation counseling; time constraints and heavy workloads, uncertainty about the usefulness of smoking cessation interventions and lack of hospital-wide systems requiring pediatricians to record tobacco use or SHS exposure information. Ideas for overcoming these barriers were building capacity of pediatricians, collaboration with international organization to initiate training, engaging top level leaders in the effort and ensuring financial resources to support the program.ConclusionsThis study among hospital administrators and service providers in China demonstrated a high level of interest in delivering SHS exposure reduction interventions in the pediatric setting. The findings can inform the creation and delivery of clinical interventions in China to promote SHS exposure reduction to children in the pediatric setting.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2431-14-266) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Our objective was to describe the prevalence and changes in tobacco use and tobacco control policies in Latin American countries and cities before and after ratification of the 2003 Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). Country-level tobacco policy data came from reports on the global tobacco epidemic (World Health Organization, 2007–2014). Global Youth Tobacco Survey data, 2000–2011, came from six countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru), 31 cities and 132,065 students. Pre- and post-FCTC prevalence and relative changes were estimated. All countries showed improvements in tobacco control policies but Mexico and Peru showed the smallest improvements. In general, adolescents reduced their tobacco use, reported less exposure to smoking at home, more tobacco education, and more retailer refusals to sell them cigarettes. Adolescents reported smaller reductions in secondhand smoke exposure outside the home and no change in exposure to tobacco media/promotions. Pre-FCTC prevalence and relative changes during the post-FCTC period were more heterogeneous across cities than across countries. Despite overall improvements in tobacco policies and the decline in exposure to tobacco, policies related to media/promotions and secondhand smoke need strengthening. There was wide variation in adolescent exposure to tobacco between cities (within countries), which suggested major heterogeneity of policy implementation at the local level.

Objectives: Despite substantial progress in reducing the burden of tobacco use in the United States (US), it remains the leading cause of preventable disease in the US. University campuses can play a pivotal role by implementing high quality tobacco-free campus policies. Methods: In preparation for updating the tobacco policy at a Midwestern university we carried out a photovoice project to incorporate student voices into the policy revision process. Participants (N=17) used disposable cameras to collect photographs and engaged in discussion groups about their experiences. Researchers analyzed focus group transcripts using a constant comparative approach. Results: Overall, 24 participants attended at least one photovoice session. They were mostly female (N=21) and mostly non-Hispanic white (N=12). Themes from the focus group discussion included effects of tobacco use on campus, negative opinions about current tobacco policy, concerns about how tobacco use affects the university, and tensions between nonsmokers and smokers. Photovoice images and captions created by participants were displayed on campus and presented to decision-makers. Conclusions: Despite limited knowledge about tobacco products and policy, many participants expressed strong opinions about the effects of policy on their student experience. Involving students in the policy process is an important step to improve implementation of tobacco policy changes.

Ten Million Calls and Counting: Progress and Promise of Tobacco Quitlines in the U.S.

We investigated associations between exposure to tobacco outlets within activity spaces and daily tobacco use, and whether exposure to adults or peers using tobacco mediate these relationships. We used Geographic Ecological Momentary Assessment data over 14 days from 85 youth aged 16-20 years in eight mid-sized California city areas. Tobacco outlet addresses and global positioning systems locations were geocoded and activity spaces were constructed by joining sequential points. We assessed daily number of tobacco outlets within 50 or 100 m of activity space polylines and number of minutes participants were within 50 or 100 m of tobacco outlets each day; daily use of tobacco; and whether participants saw (1) adults and (2) people their age (peers) using tobacco each day. Controlling for demographics, results of multilevel structural equation models showed no association between number of tobacco outlets within 50 m of polylines and tobacco use (probit regression coefficient: 0.01, p = .82). However, we found evidence of an indirect effect (p = .001) through daily exposure to peers using tobacco. Specifically, greater number of tobacco outlets within 50 m of polylines was positively associated with seeing peers use tobacco (probit regression coefficient: 0.10, p < .001). In turn, seeing peers use tobacco was positively associated with tobacco use on that day (probit regression coefficient: 2.23, p < .001). Similar results were found for number of tobacco outlets within 100 m of polylines. Exposure to tobacco outlets within activity spaces affects youth tobacco use through daily exposure to peers who use tobacco. Using real-time-ordered data, this article examines whether exposure to adults and peers using tobacco mediate associations between exposure to tobacco outlets within activity spaces and daily tobacco use among youth. Results suggest that exposure to tobacco outlets within activity spaces affects daily tobacco use through exposure to peers who use tobacco. These findings provide additional significant support for policy makers who are considering regulating the number and density of tobacco retailers and point to the importance of interventions focused on peer tobacco use and youths' daily environments to reduce tobacco use.

BackgroundTobacco use among young Pacific populations continues to undermine efforts to reduce the escalating rates of non-communicable disease in the region. Reducing tobacco use to less than 5 percent by 2025 is now a World Health Organisation (WHO) mandated target for the Pacific region. Yet, little is known about the drivers to uptake of tobacco use among young people in the Pacific. Family and peers are expected to be important in this process, but similarly, tobacco marketing may also play an important role. The tobacco industry has been highly adaptive to the changing media environment across the Pacific Islands. The aim of this study was to develop an understanding of the social cultural and media drivers to tobacco uptake and use among young Samoans to contribute to the design of effective tobacco control intervention.MethodsWe examined high school students (aged 16 and 17 years) perceptions of tobacco use in their community, access and use of media channels and the extent to which they are cognizant of both pro and anti-tobacco imagery across a range of media. Data was collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews. A thematic analysis of the interview data identified common and divergent beliefs, attitudes and behaviours surrounding tobacco use and the influence of the media.ResultsFamily is critically important for representing normative tobacco use in Samoa. The use of media, in particular digital media, was found to be conditioned by parental views on the use of media in the home. Media access remains highly regulated within more traditional households. Loyalty to traditional cultural practices (Fa’a Samoa) underpinned views on the limited influence of media on social norms around tobacco use. Parents were thought to have the greatest influence on youth smoking. Tobacco use was viewed as a personal, or family issue, and not a problem that was amendable to change at a societal level.ConclusionIn order to develop effective and culturally relevant tobacco control policies, the public health community must consider social norms around tobacco use as well as patterns of media use among young Samoans.

This study examined the relationship between school tobacco policies and tobacco use prevalence among school personnel. Two subsets of schools were identified in Bihar, India: Federal Schools (with a tobacco policy), and State schools (without a tobacco policy). Stratified probability samples of 50 schools each were selected. The survey was conducted through an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire. School personnel from State Schools (non-policy schools) reported significantly higher daily cigarette smoking and daily current smokeless tobacco use compared to personnel in Federal schools (policy schools). Teachers in State schools did not teach about health consequences of tobacco, and they had not received training for such teaching. Extent of teaching about health consequences of tobacco varied across topics for teachers in Federal schools. They received negligible training, but more than 35% reported access to teaching materials. More than one-half the personnel from Federal schools knew about their school's policy prohibiting tobacco use among students and school personnel, and about policy enforcement. Personnel in State schools did not know about tobacco control policy in their schools. All school personnel in both types of schools were near unanimous in supporting policy prohibiting tobacco use in schools. The study demonstrated an association between enacting a school policy regarding tobacco use and school personnel's use of tobacco, curricular teaching, and practical training of students. Findings suggest that more extensive introduction of comprehensive school policies may help reduce tobacco use among school personnel.

Using the Past to Understand the Future of U.S. and Global Smoking Disparities: A Birth Cohort Perspective

The aims of this study were to assess mental health workers' attitudes to addressing tobacco dependence with patients, to identify barriers that may prevent people with mental illness from receiving support, and determine workers' recommendations for tobacco policy and practice change. Questionnaires were sent to government and non-government mental health services in Adelaide, South Australia. The questionnaires asked workers to rate on a Likert rating scale their attitudes to addressing tobacco use with patients and to respond to qualitative questions about managing tobacco use within mental health services. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS version 15.0 and qualitative data was coded by three researchers into categories or themes and then analysed. Questionnaires (324) were received from staff across 45 organizations providing clinical and psychosocial services. More than two thirds of the participants felt it was important for mental health services to be involved in assisting patients to quit smoking; however, only 26% said they raised the issue of tobacco use with patients, often or as part of the assessment. Respondents on average felt approximately one third of their patients could quit or reduce tobacco use if they received nicotine replacement therapy, information and support. Most workers suggested changes to policy and practice within mental health services including smoke free areas and the provision of information and support. The rate of tobacco use amongst people with mental illness is still very high with serious social and health consequences. Mental health workers are uniquely placed to assist patients to quit or reduce tobacco use. This study has shown many workers believe that it is important to address tobacco use with their patients as part of routine care and that mental health services should implement significant tobacco policy and practice change.

Many civil society organisations (CSOs) have been at the forefront of identifying new ideas and implementing innovative models regarding health and health systems around the world. Their activities become highly charged, however, when they engage in advocacy efforts designed to influence change in policies and systems linked with more controversial or complicated public health issues. Policies, laws and regulations regarding illicit drugs and tobacco fall directly into that category. There is no doubt that the use of both kinds of substances can have the same health consequences-including ill health and death-yet they are approached in widely different ways. Smoking is legal to some extent in every country in the world, and is generally considered a matter of personal choice. Many people believe that efforts to limit tobacco use are coercive and impede on individual rights. Those who use illicit drugs such as heroin, meanwhile, are with few exceptions considered social deviants, misfits and lawbreakers. Many CSOs support comprehensive, government-funded prevention strategies coupled with non-punitive, non-judgmental programmes designed to help users change behaviour. Such strategies are designed to reflect and respond to the medically addictive nature of both tobacco and many illegal drugs. Proponents argue that not only are the public health benefits of expansive, well-conceived interventions potentially vast, but so too are the social and economic benefits accruing from lower rates of debilitating disease and premature death. To that end, many international, national and local CSOs are identifying the direct and indirect health consequences of tobacco and illegal drug use; proposing and advocating for strategies to limit their impact; and sharing information and resources with like-minded organisations elsewhere. This leadership role has helped influence and shape policy, especially in recent years. This paper examines civil society's involvement in efforts to change drug and tobacco policy in selected countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union (CEE/FSU). It concludes that in Poland and Kazakhstan, in terms of tobacco control, and increasingly in Ukraine and parts of Central Asia in terms of harm reduction, multi-sectoral approaches are the most effective way to engage citizens and to implement comprehensive strategies to change behaviour by supportive measures, not punitive ones.