Structure–activity and immunochemical data provide evidence of developmental- and tissue-specific myosuppressin signaling

Abstract

Myosuppressin peptides dramatically diminish contractions of the gut and heart. Thus, delineating mechanisms involved in myosuppressin signaling may provide insight into peptidergic control of muscle contractility. Drosophila myosuppressin (DMS, TDVDHVFLRFamide) structure–activity relationship (SAR) was investigated to identify an antagonist and explore signaling. Alanyl-substituted, N-terminal truncated, and modified amino acid analogs identified residues and peptide length required for activity. Immunochemistry independently provided insight into myosuppressin mechanisms. DMS decreased gut motility and cardiac contractility dose dependently; the different effective concentrations at half maximal-response were indicative of tissue-specific mechanisms. Replacement of aspartic acid 2 (D2) generated an analog with different developmental- and tissue-specific effects; [A2] DMS mimicked DMS in adult gut (100% inhibition), yet decreased larval gut contractions by only 32% with increased potency in pupal heart (126% inhibition). The DMS active core differed across development and in tissues; adult (DHVFLRFamide) and larval gut (TDVDHVFLRFamide), and adult (VFLRFamide) and pupal heart (VFLRFamide). Substitution of D2 and D4 with a modified amino acid, p-benzoyl-phenylalanine, produced developmental- and tissue-specific antagonists. In the presence of protease inhibitors, DMS and VFLRFamide were more effective in adult gut, but lower or unchanged in pupal heart compared to peptide or analog alone, respectively. DMS-specific antisera stained neurons that innervated the gut or heart. This study describes novel antagonists and data to identify developmental- and tissue-specific mechanisms underlying the pleotropic effects of myosuppressin in muscle physiology.