Abstract

In the literature, the study of price subsidies of new technologies has focused on the tactical problem of achieving maximum penetration under a budget constraint over a short horizon. In practice, such tactical, short-term penetration objectives seem both to adequately reflect the structure of many price subsidy programs (e.g., solar energy), and account for their high failure rate. The present paper goes beyond determining optimal price and subsidy paths under a budget constraint and focuses on strategic decision making. A generic strategic objective of price subsidies is to make a product or technology competitive at an earlier point in the future than would otherwise be possible. This begs the natural question of feasibility. While determining feasibility, we derive detailed price and subsidy paths and the government budget required. Then, we can iteratively determine the program that maximizes welfare.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.