Abstract
Simple Summary‘Crowding’, keeping too many birds per m2, is one of the largest welfare concerns in the poultry industry. It is therefore worrisome that there is a gap in research investigating the effects of high stocking densities during the rearing phase of laying hens. This study evaluated anxious behavior and corticosterone levels, a hormone involved in the stress response, during the first 10 weeks of laying hen chicks housed under three different crowding conditions: undercrowding, conventional crowding, and overcrowding. We found that overcrowded chicks displayed more anxious behavior compared to undercrowded chicks. Corticosterone levels were elevated in both extreme groups in week 3, but dropped to values of the conventional crowding group at week 10. We conclude that current conventional stocking densities do not seem to impair the welfare state of the laying hen chick, and that a three-fold in- or decrease of density influences stress and anxiety, but within the adaptive capacity of the chick. Important side-notes to this conclusion are that an increase of stocking density did result in a slower rate of adaptation, and that we currently do not know if there are long-term consequences of different crowding densities reaching into the laying period.The recent increases in stocking density, in extreme cases resulting in ‘crowding’, have a major impact on poultry welfare. In contrast to available research on adult laying hens, there is a gap in the literature studying the rearing phase. The present study investigated the effects of stocking density during the rearing period on the welfare of the laying hen chick. The chicks were housed under one of three crowding conditions, increasing with age: undercrowding (500-1000-1429 cm2 per chick), conventional crowding (167-333-500 cm2 per chick), or overcrowding (56-111-167 cm2 per chick). The parameters evaluated encompassed behavioral and physiological factors related to anxiety and stress. We found that during the first 6 weeks, overcrowded chicks displayed more anxious behavior than undercrowded chicks, and both extreme densities induced higher corticosterone levels compared to chicks housed under conventional crowding. At 10 weeks of age, plasma corticosterone had dropped to the level of conventional crowding group in both groups, whereas feather corticosterone remained high only in the overcrowded group. We conclude that current conventional stocking densities do not seem to impair the welfare state of the laying hen chick, and that a three-fold increase or decrease of density influences corticosterone levels and anxious behavior, but within the adaptive capacity of the chick. Important side notes to this conclusion are that an increase of stocking density did result in a slower rate of adaptation, and that there could be long-term consequences of both the different stocking densities and/or increased costs of adaptation.
Highlights
Since the industrial revolution, poultry farming production systems have been scaling up toSince the industrial revolution, poultry farming production systems have been scaling up to increase economic returns
There was an overall effect of crowding condition on behavior in the open field F(10,62) = 3.27, p
The groups differed in latency to leave the starting field, F(2,34) = 4.41, p = 0.025, η2 = 0.21 (Figure 4A); time spent walking, F(2,34) = 9.19, p = 0.003, η2 = 0.35 (Figure 4B); number of lines crossed, F(2,34) = 7.00, p = 0.007, η2 = 0.29 (Figure 4C); and number of distress calls omitted, F(2,34) = 4.74, p
Summary
Poultry farming production systems have been scaling up to increase economic returns. An important consequence is an increase of stocking density in both the rearing and laying phase of layer hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). If taken to the extreme, this can lead ‘overcrowding’, keeping too many birds per square meter, which can have a major impact on welfare. It has been shown to be an predictor for the development of feather pecking [2,3], which is one of the most significant challenges important predictor for the development of feather pecking [2,3], which is one of the most significant in poultry welfare [4]. This is not surprising, since in general it is well known that experience during early life can have long-term effects [5,6]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.