Abstract

PurposeThis scoping review aims to evaluate the evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost as a potential alternative for brachytherapy (BCT) in treating cervical cancer. Material and methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Studies investigating SBRT boost in cervical cancer patients who were either contraindicated for or refused BCT were included. The review examined SBRT efficacy and safety. ResultsSixteen studies were included, encompassing prospective (n = 4) and retrospective cohort studies (n = 8), as well as phase I and II trials (n = 4). The most common SBRT boost dose was 25 Gray(Gy)/5 fractions (ranging from 18 to 40 Gy/3–5 fractions). Local control rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year ranged from 86 % to 100 %, 78–92 %, and 81–92 %, respectively. Overall survival (OS) rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year rates ranged from 49 % to 95 %, 50–77 %, and 50–69 %, respectively. Two studies reported a pathological complete response rate of 93 % and 94 % three months after the SBRT boost. Most studies reported low rates of late grade 3 or higher genitourinary (0–14 %) and gastrointestinal (0–26 %) toxicities. The overall incidence of rectovaginal fistulas ranged from 0 % to 13 %. ConclusionThis scoping review suggests SBRT boost as a promising alternative to selected cervical cancer patients who cannot receive BCT. The results indicate a high local control with acceptable toxicity profiles. However, further research is needed to define optimal SBRT boost parameters, identify patient selection criteria, and address knowledge gaps regarding long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.