Abstract

BackgroundPsychiatric services have undergone profound changes over the last decades. CEPHOS-LINK is an EU-funded study project with the aim to compare readmission of patients discharged with psychiatric diagnoses using a registry-based observational record linkage study design and to analyse differences in the findings for five different countries. A range of different approaches is available for analysis of the available data. Although there are some studies that compare selected methods for evaluating questions on readmission, there are to our knowledge no published systematic literature reviews on commonly used methods and their comparison. This work shall therefore provide an overview of the methods in use, their evolution throughout history and new developments which can further improve the research quality in this area.MethodsBased on systematic literature reviews realized in the course of the CEPHOS-LINK study, this work is a systematic evaluation of mathematical (statistical and modelling) methods used in studies examining psychiatric readmission. The starting point were 502 papers, of which 407 were analysed in detail; Methods used were assigned to one of five categories with subcategories and analysed accordingly. Our particular interest next to survival analysis and regression models is modelling and simulation.ResultsAs population sizes and follow-up times in the included studies varied widely, a range of methods was applied. Studies with bigger sample sizes conducted survival and regression analysis more often than studies with fewer patients did. These latter relied more on classical statistical tests (e.g. t-tests and Student Newman Keuls). Statistical strategies were often insufficiently described, posing a major problem for the evaluation. Almost all cases failed to provide and explanation of the rationale behind using certain methods.ConclusionThere is a discernible trend from classical parametric/nonparametric tests in older studies towards regression and survival analyses in more recent ones. Modelling and simulation were under-represented despite their high usability, as has been identified in other health applications and comparable research areas.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1128-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Psychiatric services have undergone profound changes over the last decades

  • Classic methods for evaluating studies in health care involve descriptive and test statistics, usually comparing two or more groups. This methodological pool is supplemented by various types of regression analysis, which belong to the domain of classic statistics

  • The large number of studies reviewed (N = 407) guarantees a broad overview of methods used in the analysis of readmission of adults with mental illness in real world application

Read more

Summary

Introduction

CEPHOS-LINK is an EUfunded study project with the aim to compare readmission of patients discharged with psychiatric diagnoses using a registry-based observational record linkage study design and to analyse differences in the findings for five different countries. Classic methods for evaluating studies in health care involve descriptive and test statistics, usually comparing two or more groups. This methodological pool is supplemented by various types of regression analysis, which belong to the domain of classic statistics. The time-frame of recorded databases is naturally becoming longer, the value of methods for longitudinal data analysis and its research field is increasing [3]. Methods of survival analysis are being adapted and extended in order to meet the necessity of analysing recurrent events and handling gap-times [4, 5], multi-episode survival analysis [4] and more generally the increased utilization of epidemiologic methods [5]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.