Abstract
The United States’ refusal to reappoint judges to the WTO Appellate Body will potentially render the appellate mechanism functionless at the end of this year. One of the alleged justifications provided by the Trump Administration – the treatment of previous Appellate Body reports as precedent – is the subject of this article. By examining the WTO legal framework as well as relevant case law, the paper demonstrates that the criticism in this regard is unjustified, and instead rather serves to conceal the dissatisfaction with consecutive negative decisions by panels and the Appellate Body, dismantling protectionist US measures.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
