Stapled intestinal anastomoses are more cost effective than hand-sewn anastomoses in a diagnosis related group system

Abstract

PurposeCreation of an optimal bowel anastomosis with low postoperative leakage rate is an immanent part of colorectal surgery contributing to recovery, length of hospital stay and overall hospital costs. We aimed to investigate costs of small and large bowel resection, length of hospital stay, anastomotic leakage rate and its risk factors depending on the anastomotic technique. MethodsRetrospective analysis of 198 patients (67 stapled and 131 hand-sewn anastomoses) undergoing elective bowel resection with a single anastomosis without protective ileostomy either stapled or in double-rowed running suture technique between 1st October 2012 and 30th September 2018 at Charité University Hospital Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin. We analyzed costs of treatment, total length of hospital stay, rate of anastomotic leakage and possible risk factors for anastomotic leak. ResultsNo significant difference between both anastomotic techniques could be detected for hospital stay (p = 0.754), 30-day-readmission rate (p = 0.827), or anastomotic leakage (p = 606). Neither comorbidities (p = 0.449), underlying disease (p = 0.132), experience of the surgical team (p = 0.828) nor scheduling of the operation (p = 0.531) were associated with anastomotic leakage. Stapled anastomoses took 22 min less operation time than sutured anastomoses (130 vs. 152 min. Median) (p = 0.001). Operations with stapled anastomoses saved 183 € in operation costs and 496 € in overall hospital costs. ConclusionStapled and hand-sewn bowel anastomoses can be performed equally safe without differences in postoperative outcome. No patient, procedure or surgeon related risk factors for anastomotic leakage could be detected. Bowel resections with stapled anastomoses take less time and save operation and overall hospital costs.