Abstract
The crime of aiding cybercriminal activities has shown an explosive growth trend in recent years, evolving to the risk of becoming a pocket crime. To address the existing challenges and issues with this crime, it is crucial to clarify the connotation and denotation of knowingly within the context of this crime and establish a set of relatively standardized and rational inference rules. Through a criminal law analysis of the term knowingly, judicial pathway reviews, and academic theory reflections, the term should be understood as know or clearly know. This interpretation aims to limit judicial scope and alleviate the pressure on the judicial system. The construction of a standardized set of inference rules for knowingly in the context of aiding cybercrime is both necessary and rational. Scholars, both domestic and international, have presented relevant theories, with the current trend favoring an objective-oriented approach complemented by subjective evaluation. After analyzing over a thousand case studies and combining related thoughts, the author proposes a Weighted Scoring Rule and offers several recommendations concerning the current judicial systems institutional design.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
