Abstract

There is a gap in the health policy literature regarding how policy or best practice guidelines might be implemented in a robust and systematic manner. In particular, there is a need for analyses that account for local contingencies coupled with the top down perspective of policy adherence in a systematic and integrated manner. In this paper we use themes of standardisation and localisation to analyse the policy implementation process. We analyse the implementation of large-scale evidence-based health care policy to understand the negotiation process required to achieve a goal of comparability across locations with adaptability to the local setting. We argue for more robust policy implementation in health, where standardisation is acknowledged and supported but there is also an imperative to accommodate local infrastructure and context. Rather than a top-down or bottom-up perspective, standardising policies need to continuously engage with, and learn from, local settings, thus forming a local universality.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.