Abstract
Decisions about sports symbols on college campuses, such as team nicknames, mascots and logos, are often contentious and involve many stakeholder groups (Connolly, 2000; Farnall, 2004 a, 2004 b). The purpose of this study is to determine the salience of stakeholder groups in the decision to change or retain Native American athletic team nicknames. Mitchell, Agile and Wood (1997) theorize that stakeholder salience is comprised of power, legitimacy and urgency. Researchers applied Mitchell, Agile and Wood's (1997) theory to the case of one university which they followed with a nationwide survey of decision makers at 30 institutions having Native American nicknames or mascots. Alumni were found to be definitive stakeholders with power, legitimacy and urgency while other stakeholder groups possessed only one or two stakeholder salience attributes. Respondents rated presidential readiness as the most important decision factor (M = 4.33 on a 5-point scale). Other highly rated factors were access to, communication with and official support from stakeholders. Results provide support for Mitchell, Agile and Wood's (1997) theory and suggest that university administrators must attend to changes in stakeholder salience, particularly changes in the urgency of a stakeholder's claim.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
