Stakeholder's perceived value of surgical audit data provided by the Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality.

Abstract

Clinical audits can vary in their effectiveness depending on how the information is provided and the relationship between those giving and receiving feedback. In the Australian state of Victoria, the Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality (VASM) is a state-wide mortality audit that, prior to this study, did not have a bidirectional feedback mechanism in place to gauge perception of the audit held by its stakeholders. We aimed to investigate the perceived quality of the audit's information and the effectiveness of the audit's communication strategies from the stakeholder population. We used a mixed methods approach to provide open-ended explorations into stakeholders' views while also providing structured tools for conducting annual reviews. The qualitative data were analysed using an inductive content analysis. Between 2015 and 2017, 240 VASM stakeholders were contacted, of whom 82 (34.2%) agreed to be interviewed. The VASM's data were perceived to be of high quality and used in a variety of ways. The audit's communication strategies were seen to be adequate but could be more targeted to the stakeholder. There is a perception that the audit might not be relevant to hospital stakeholders that are not themselves clinicians, despite direct involvement with the audit. This study helps to explain the role the audit plays among its stakeholders and offers three overarching recommendations for improvement strategies: produce data sharing strategies that are relevant to rural or highly specialised surgical centres, improve communication to be targeted at stakeholders and explore methods to provide feedback to hospital management with more individualised feedback.