Stable mechanical environments created by a low-tension traction device is beneficial for the regeneration and repair of degenerated intervertebral discs

Abstract

BACKGROUNDBy blocking the cascade of reactions leading to intervertebral disc degeneration through immobilization-traction, a delay in intervertebral disc degeneration and its regeneration, to some extent, has been observed. However, the precise balance of regulation of the microenvironment of intervertebral disc biomechanics and coordination of the complex spatiotemporal reconstruction of the extracellular matrix have not yet been solved, and clinical results are far from successful. PURPOSEIn the present study, a mechanical degeneration model was constructed to evaluate the possibility and effectiveness of disc regeneration or repair through low-tension traction of degenerated discs so as to provide basic biomechanical information for clinical optimization of the traction device and to establish traction parameters for prevention and treatment of disc degeneration. STUDY DESIGNA macro-, micro-, and nano-level structural analysis of degenerative discs of rat tail before and after controlled traction. METHODSSix-month-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into seven groups: Group A: control group (instrumented with Kirschner [K]-wires only); Group B: Model group (caudal vertebrae immobilized using a custom-made external device to fix four caudal vertebrae [Co7−Co10], while Co8−Co9 vertebrae underwent 4 weeks of compression to induce disc degeneration); Group C: experimental control group (devices removed after the 4 week compression described in Group B, and recovered by themselves for 4 weeks). The remaining four groups represented intervention groups (Groups D and F: Co8−Co9 vertebrae compressed for 4 weeks followed by 2 or 4 weeks of in situ traction, respectively; Groups E and G: vertebrae compressed for 4 weeks followed by 2 or 4 weeks of excessive traction, respectively). X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging were performed at each time point to measure disc height and T2 signal intensity. At the end of the experiment, the animals were euthanized and tail vertebrae harvested for analysis of intervertebral disc histopathology, proteoglycan content, elastic modulus of fibers of the annulus fibrosus (AF) and nucleus pulposus (NP), and microstructure of the bony end plate. RESULTSAfter 2 to 4 weeks of continuous traction (in situ and excessive traction), the Co8–Co9 intervertebral disc space of rats in Groups D to G increased significantly compared with Groups B and C (p < .05). In addition, signs of tissue regeneration were apparent in all four intervention groups (D–G). In addition, histologic scores of the intervention groups (D–G) were significantly lower than those in the model and experimental control groups (Groups B and C, respectively), although no significant difference was found between those four groups. Compared with the model group (Group B), total proteoglycan content of the NP in the intervention groups (D–G) increased significantly (p < .05). After 2 to 4 weeks of intervention (in situ and excessive traction), the morphology of pores in the bony end plate, their number, and the diameter had recovered significantly compared with those in Group B. The in situ traction group was superior to the excessive traction group, and 4 weeks in situ group significantly superior to the 2 weeks group. In all intervention groups, in both the inner and outer AF, mean fibril diameter decreased significantly (p < .05), although they remained larger in the excessive traction group than that in the in situ traction group. Consistent with trend in collagen fiber diameter, the outer AF was stiffer than the inner, and the modulus of the AF in each intervention group not significantly different from that of the control group (Group A) except Group C. However, within the NP, the variation in trend in diameter and modulus of collagen fibers was essentially inconsistent with that of the AF. CONCLUSIONSDegenerated discs exhibit greater reconstruction after low tension traction. It is clear that the intervertebral disc mechanical microenvironment depends to a greater extent on low-tension traction than high-tension traction.