Splicing Predictions, Splicing Assays, and Variant Classification Using ACMG/AMP Guidelines: Challenges Observed with BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants.

Background: The introduction of multi-gene panel testing and improved awareness under patients and physicians has led to an increase of individuals with known germline pathogenic variants in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) genes. Significant regional differences exist in germline mutational landscape. We aimed to report the findings from multi-gene panel testing in a large Belgian cohort of individuals at risk for HBOC. Methods: All individuals who underwent multi-gene panel testing for HBOC at the Center for Human Genetics of the University Hospitals Leuven since the introduction of the panel were included (March 2016-April 2019). All included individuals were considered candidates for HBOC-panel testing by the requesting physician based on a personal or familial history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Testing criteria from the Belgian Society of Human Genetics (www.beshg.be/download/guidelines/Guidelines_HBOC_2018.pdf) were met in the vast majority. The panel used was the BRCA Hereditary Cancer MASTR Plus® (Agilent, Belgium), with sequencing of BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, TP53, MRE11A, RAD50, NBN, FAM175A, ATM, PALB2, STK11, MEN1, PTEN, CDH1, MUTYH, CHEK2, BLM, XRCC2, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH6, PMS2 and MSH2. Sequencing was performed by NGS on a Miseq platform (Illumina). Genomic deletions and duplications in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were investigated with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. We hereby report on the frequency of pathogenic and likely pathogenic germline variants in this population. Results: In 5422 individuals who underwent multi-gene panel testing, we detected 665 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 639 patients (11,7%). In 25 patients (0.46%), more than one relevant alteration was detected with double heterozygosity in 24 individuals and triple heterozygosity in one. Germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were detected in 178 (3.3%) and 144 (2.7%) patients, resulting in a fraction of 26,4% and 21,4% of detected variants respectively. Relevant alterations in CHEK2, ATM, PALB2 and TP53 were observed in 135 (2.5%), 93 (1.7%), 26 (0.5%) and 11 (0.2%) patients respectively, accounting together for 39.3% of detected variants. Alterations in BRIP1/RAD51C/RAD51D were retrieved in 64 patients (1.2%) and alterations in mismatch-repair genes MSH6/MLH1/PMS2/MSH2 were detected in 0.3% of patients. These patients where dominantly referred for familial history of ovarian cancer. Furthermore, germline alterations in PTEN, CDH1 and BLM were observed in 3, 2 and 1 cases respectively. Double heterozygosity for ATM+CHEK2 and for ATM+BRCA2 were both observed in 3 cases. In the patient with triple heterozygosity, co-occurrence of pathogenic variants in BRCA2, ATM and CHEK2 was detected. Conclusions: In a large Belgian cohort of 5422 individuals at risk for HBOC who underwent multi-gene panel testing, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant was detected in 11,7% of patients, and in 0,46% of patients double or triple heterozygosity for HBOC-variants was observed. Almost 40% of detected variants were alterations beyond BRCA correlated with hereditary breast cancer (CHEK2, ATM, PALB2 and TP53). Given the time-lag to predictive testing in families, a significant rise in healthy carriers with these non-BRCA alterations is expected in the upcoming years. Citation Format: Kevin Punie, Griet Hoste, Griet Van Buggenhout, Ellen Denayer, Hilde Brems, Hilde Peeters, Ann Smeets, Ines Nevelsteen, Patrick Neven, Jan Ardui, Renate Prevos, Machteld Keupers, Chantal Van Ongeval, Giuseppe Floris, Christine Desmedt, Hans Wildiers, Geneviève Michils, Hilde Van Esch, Eric Legius. Germline mutational landscape in 5422 individuals at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who underwent multi-gene panel testing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-08-03.

Eligibility Criteria and Genetic Testing Results from a High-Risk Cohort for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome in Southeastern Ontario

DNA-based screening and population health: a points to consider statement for programs and sponsoring organizations from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

Background: Hereditary cancer syndromes explain 5-10% of all cancer cases. Germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes (BRCA) are present in 2-3% of all breast cancer (BC), and 15% of all ovarian cancer (OC) cases. BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PV) represent 25-28% of BC and 40% of OC patients with a positive familial history. BRCAs are the most studied genes for the prevalence, family history, preventive surgeries, and target treatment options in both BC and OC. There are other genes, important in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment options of the patients: TP53, PALB2, CHEK2, among others. This study aims to identify the prevalence of non- BRCA genes related to the development of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome in patients of Northeast Mexico. Methods: This is a multicenter study that recruited patients from two reference oncology centers in Nuevo Leon, Mexico: the CECIL (The CUCC Early Cancer Detection Clinic) Hereditary Cancer Registry and Hereditary Cancer Program from Tec Salud. From March of 2016 to March of 2023, a total of 872 patients meeting NCCN criteria were evaluated by Medical Geneticists from both centers and were tested with NGS multigene cancer panels. Results: A total of 665 (76.26%) patients with a clinical diagnosis of HBOC (Hereditary Breast Hereditary Cancer Syndrome) were included. We found 310 (46.6%) patients had at least one variant, 180 (58%) with at least one pathogenic variant, and 130 (41%) with a VUS (a variant of uncertain significance). BRCA1 was found in 79 (43.8%) and BRCA2 in 32 (17.7%) of all PV. Non-BRCA PV were found in 69 (38.3%) patients: 4 ATM, 2 BLM, 3 BRIP1, 22 CHEK2, 4 CDKN2A, 5 MUTYH, 10 PALB2, 4 RAD51C, 2 SDHA, 2 TP53, 2 WRN, CDH1, CDK4, DICER, MSH3, NBN, PTEN, RAD50, USH2A one of each. Is remarkable that 19 of the 22 patients with CHEK2 and 5 of the 10 patients with PALB2 had the recurrent PV c.707T>C and c.2167_2168del, respectively. Conclusions: Non-BRCA PV in Northern Mexico corresponds to one-third of the BC and OC cases, including HRD (homologous recombination deficiency) genes. HDR patient carriers are potential targets of iPARP therapies. This project reinforces the fact that multigene panels should be employed to ensure a complete diagnosis in hereditary cancer patients. Citation Format: Carlos H. Burciaga-Flores, Diana C. Perez-Ibave, Maria L. Garza-Rodriguez, Oscar Vidal-Gutierrez, Cynthia M. Villarreal-Garza, Dione Aguilar y Mendez. Non-BRCA variants in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients in the Northern Mexico population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3947.

The hereditary cancer burden in India is on the rise due to an increase in awareness of the disease, decrease in the cost of genetic testing and opportunities for genetic counseling. More and more individuals from high risk families are undergoing genetic testing to assess their likelihood of developing the disease. On the other hand, the clinical community is facing a significant challenge on how to interpret and classify a variant as disease-causing or benign. This is because a large fraction of the variants identified in the affected individuals from India have not been reported in hereditary disease databases such as the Breast cancer Information Core (BIC), Clinvar and Swissvar. These variants of unknown significance (VUS) present in individuals from high risk families create a great deal of uncertainty on clinical follow up and disease management. We performed a retrospective analysis on more than 300 affected cases of hereditary ovarian and breast cancer tested at our genomics center in the last three years. We compiled all the known pathogenic variants and compared their distribution in the Indian cohort with what has been reported worldwide. The most prevalent mutation in BRCA1 p.Glu23Valfs*17 (185delAG) was detected at a frequency of 20.34% in line with what has been found worldwide. In addition, frameshift mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were most frequently detected in breast and ovarian cancer in line with previous findings. Additionally, our analysis identified 13 novel previously unreported and potentially pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Variants were also detected in several moderate penetrance genes such as CHEK2, BARD1 and ATM involved in DNA damage response and in MSH2 and MSH6 genes regulating epigenetic control through chromatin modification. In this study, we report novel pathogenic variants in genes associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in the Indian population. Citation Format: Lakshmi Mahadevan, Aditya Nair, Vedam L. Ramprasad. A retrospective analysis of the spectrum of genetic variations associated with hereditary cancers in Indians. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2558.

Rates of breast and ovarian cancer are high in the Caribbean; however, to date, few published data quantify the prevalence of inherited cancer in the Caribbean population. To determine whether deleterious variants in genes that characterize the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome are associated with the development of breast and ovarian cancer in the English- and Creole-speaking Caribbean populations. This multisite genetic association study used data from germline genetic test results between June 2010 and June 2018 in the Bahamas, Cayman Islands, Barbados, Dominica, Jamaica, Haiti, and Trinidad and Tobago. Next-generation sequencing on a panel of 30 genes and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (BRCA1 and BRCA2) were performed. Medical records were reviewed at time of study enrollment. Women and men diagnosed with breast and ovarian cancer with at least 1 grandparent born in the participating study sites were included; 1018 individuals were eligible and consented to participate in this study. Data were analyzed from November 4, 2019, to May 6, 2020. Breast and/or ovarian cancer diagnosis. Rate of inherited breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and spectrum and types of variants. Of 1018 participants, 999 (98.1%) had breast cancer (mean [SD] age, 46.6 [10.8] years) and 21 (2.1%) had ovarian cancer (mean [SD] age, 47.6 [13.5] years). Three individuals declined to have their results reported. A total of 144 of 1015 (14.2%) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome gene. A total of 64% of variant carriers had P/LP variant in BRCA1, 23% in BRCA2, 9% in PALB2 and 4% in RAD51C, CHEK2, ATM, STK11 and NBN. The mean (SD) age of variant carriers was 40.7 (9.2) compared with 47.5 (10.7) years in noncarriers. Individuals in the Bahamas had the highest proportion of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (23%), followed by Barbados (17.9%), Trinidad (12%), Dominica (8.8%), Haiti (6.7%), Cayman Islands (6.3%), and Jamaica (4.9%). In Caribbean-born women and men with breast cancer, having a first- or second-degree family member with breast cancer was associated with having any BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline variant (odds ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.24-2.01; P < .001). A BRCA1 vs BRCA2 variant was more strongly associated with triple negative breast cancer (odds ratio, 6.33; 95% CI, 2.05-19.54; P = .001). In this study, among Caribbean-born individuals with breast and ovarian cancer, 1 in 7 had hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The proportion of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer varied by island and ranged from 23% in the Bahamas to 4.9% in Jamaica. Each island had a distinctive set of variants.

IntroductionThe aim of the study is to evaluate the incidence and phenotype-genotype characteristics of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes in Latvia in order to develop the basis of clinical management for patients and their relatives affected by this syndrome.Materials and methodsIn 2002-2004 in two Latvian oncology hospitals (Liepãja Oncology Hospital and Daugavpils Oncology Hospital) cancer family histories were collected from 287 consecutive patients with breast and ovarian cancer. In all cases, when it was possible to obtain the blood sample, DNA testing for founder mutations in the BRCA1 gene was performed.ResultsAmong 287 family cancer histories analysed in 8 (2.8%) cases criteria of hereditary breast cancer (HBC) were fulfilled and in 5 (1.7%) cases hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) was diagnosed. In 50 (17.4%) cases we have suspicion of hereditary breast cancer (HBC susp.) and in 8 (2.8%) cases - suspicion of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC susp.). We have one (0.3%) case with hereditary ovarian cancer (HOC). DNA testing of founder mutations in the BRCA1 gene (exon 20 (5382 insC) exon 5 (300T/G), exon 11, 17 (4153delA)) for 178/287 (62%) patients was performed. In 9/287 (4.9%) cases we found a mutation in the BRCA1 gene. 4 mutations were detected in exon 11, 17 (4153delA) and 4 mutations in exon 20 (5382 insC) and 1 in exon 5.ConclusionsExisting pedigree/clinical data suggest that in Latvia the clinical frequency of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer is around 5% of consecutive breast and ovarian cancer patients and suspicion of the syndrome is observed in another 20% of cases. Frequency of BRCA1 founder mutations is 5% of all consecutive breast and ovarian cancers. Considerable geographical differences in the clinical and molecular frequency of hereditary breast ovarian cancer have been observed in Latvia.

Simple SummaryThe French Canadian population of the province of Quebec has been investigated because of its genetic attributes and is known for making significant contributions to the medical genetics field. Their unique genetic background has been attributed to a small number of early settlers from France that contributed to the majority of the gene pool. The French Canadian population has been investigated for the role of known breast and ovarian cancer predisposing genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2. In this review we describe the merits of studying this population with respect to the discovery of new such cancer predisposing gene.The French Canadian population of the province of Quebec has been recognized for its contribution to research in medical genetics, especially in defining the role of heritable pathogenic variants in cancer predisposing genes. Multiple carriers of a limited number of pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, the major risk genes for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome families, have been identified in French Canadians, which is in stark contrast to the array of over 2000 different pathogenic variants reported in each of these genes in other populations. As not all such cancer syndrome families are explained by BRCA1 and BRCA2, newly proposed gene candidates identified in other populations have been investigated for their role in conferring risk in French Canadian cancer families. For example, multiple carriers of distinct variants were identified in PALB2 and RAD51D. The unique genetic architecture of French Canadians has been attributed to shared ancestry due to common ancestors of early settlers of this population with origins mainly from France. In this review, we discuss the merits of genetically characterizing cancer predisposing genes in French Canadians of Quebec. We focused on genes that have been implicated in hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome families as they have been the most thoroughly characterized cancer syndromes in this population. We describe how genetic analyses of French Canadians have facilitated: (i) the classification of variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2; (ii) the identification and classification of variants in newly proposed breast and/or ovarian cancer predisposing genes; and (iii) the identification of a new breast cancer predisposing gene candidate, RECQL. The genetic architecture of French Canadians provides a unique opportunity to evaluate new candidate cancer predisposing genes regardless of the population in which they were identified.

BackgroundPathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 cause hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Screening of these genes has become easily accessible in diagnostic laboratories. Sequencing and copy number analyses are used to detect pathogenic variants, but also lead to identification of variants of unknown clinical significance (VUS). If the effect of a VUS can be clarified, it has direct consequence for the clinical management of the patient and family members. A splicing assay is one of several tools that might help in the classification of VUS. We therefore established mRNA analyses for BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the diagnostic laboratory in 2015. We hereby report the results of mRNA analysis variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 after three years.MethodsVariants predicted to alter splicing and variants within the canonical splice sites were selected for splicing analyses. Splicing assays were performed by reverse transcription-PCR of patient RNA. A biallalic expression analysis was carried out whenever possible.ResultsTwenty-five variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were analyzed by splicing assays; nine showed altered transcripts and 16 showed normal splicing patterns. The two novel pathogenic variants in BRCA1 c.4484 + 3 A > C and c.5407–10G > A were characterized.ConclusionsWe conclude that mRNA analyses are useful in characterization of variants that may affect splicing. The results can guide classification of variants from unknown clinical significance to pathogenic or benign in a diagnostic laboratory, and thus be of direct clinical importance.

BACKGROUND: Germline genetic testing is routinely incorporated into clinical care for breast cancer patients to inform management decisions and reduce risk for developing subsequent cancers. While the diagnostic yield of cancer genetic testing has increased over the years due to adoption of multigene panels, a substantial portion of breast cancer patients remain without a molecular diagnosis yet are suspected to have a genetic mutation that could not be detected and/or classified with standard DNA testing techniques. We assessed the ability of a novel genetic testing approach involving simultaneous DNA and RNA analysis to increase the diagnostic yield and decrease the number of variants of unknown significance (VUS). METHODS: Women with a personal history of breast cancer were ascertained from a larger cohort of patients referred for concurrent RNA sequencing alongside DNA hereditary cancer panel testing by ordering clinicians from 18 collaborating medical centers across the United States. Test result classifications were evaluated for women whose testing included sixteen clinically-actionable hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (HBOC) genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, NF1, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53). RESULTS: In this cohort of 746 breast cancer patients, the addition of RNA sequencing increased the pathogenic variant detection rate from 8% to 9% across sixteen HBOC genes. These RNA-related positive results included two pathogenic variants in BRCA1 occurring outside the standard analytical range of DNA testing and three VUS (one each in ATM, BRCA2, and PMS2) that were reclassified as likely pathogenic as a result of additional information provided by RNA sequencing. In addition, two VUS were reclassified to benign/likely benign (one each in MSH2 and BRCA2). Together, these five variant reclassifications contributed to a 3% relative decrease in the number of unique VUS classifications (reduced from 182 to 177 unique VUS). In addition, 31 previously-tested patients received reclassification reports. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent DNA and RNA genetic testing has shown immediate promise in this pilot study, leading to the identification of five breast cancer patients with mutations in clinically actionable genes that would otherwise have received inconclusive or negative results with DNA testing alone. By increasing the detection of germline pathogenic variants and reducing VUS classifications, concurrent DNA and RNA genetic testing increases the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of hereditary cancer testing for breast cancer patients. Citation Format: Holly LaDuca, Lily Hoang, Jill Dolinsky, Jessica Profato, Amal Yussuf, Carolyn Horton, Cara Dresbold, Cassie Garcia, Catherine Koptiuch, Danielle Dondanville, Danielle McKenna, Danielle Menashe, Deborah Wham, Deepika Nathan, Diane Samad, Elizabeth Hoodfar, Gayle Patel, Jen Moore, Jennifer Geurts, John Lee, Kara Milliron, Khateriaa Pyrtel, Meagan Farmer, Meredith Seidel, Morgan Depas, Nichole Morman, Olivia Tan, Rebekah Krukenberg, Rob Pilarski, Samantha Stachowiak, Sandra Jenkinson, Sara Pirzadeh-Miller, Shraddha Gaonkar, Tiffani Demarco, Brigette Tippin Davis, Elizabeth C Chao, Rachid Karam. Concurrent DNA and RNA genetic testing identifies more patients with hereditary breast cancer than DNA testing alone [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-08-08.

Germline DNA tests to identify pathogenic variants in genes linked to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility have become widely available. However, the clinical utility of genetic testing depends on...

The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and educational needs with regard to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer among nurses working in breast cancer care in the Nagasaki Prefecture. In breast cancer care, the identification of patients at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer is necessary for the implementation of genetic testing and counseling. Nurses should be involved in this process, since they play a crucial role in the care of patients with breast cancer. However, the knowledge regarding hereditary breast and ovarian cancer among nurses working in oncology care in Japan has not been assessed. The design of this study is cross-sectional design. We distributed 597 surveys to nurses working in breast cancer care. The surveys assessed the nurses’ demographic data, their current knowledge and practices regarding cancer genetics and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, and their attitude and preferences regarding learning about the condition. We received 317 valid replies. Nurses had limited knowledge about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer characteristics: 41.6% reported that they do not know about the condition, whereas less than 10% knew its characteristics. However, nurses were aware of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer significance and were willing to learn about it: 91% wished to learn about the condition, and 88.6% wanted to participate in study group meetings. Further, nurses’ preferences regarding educational programs were clarified. Overall, our results show that educational programs should be implemented to advance nurses’ knowledge of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer characteristics.

Points to consider: is there evidence to support BRCA1/2 and other inherited breast cancer genetic testing for all breast cancer patients? A statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

Demands for genetic counseling with BRCA1/2 examination have markedly increased. Accordingly, the incidence of uninformative results on BRCA1/2 mutation status has also increased. Because most patients examined for BRCA1/2 mutation have a high risk of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer, many patients suffer psychological distress even when the BRCA1/2 result is negative. We compared oncological outcomes between BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer with high risk of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer and sporadic breast cancer without risk of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer. The criteria for high risk for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer were defined as family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer in first- or second-degree relative, early onset breast cancer at <35years old and bilateral breast cancer. Patients were matched maximally 1:3 into those who identified as negative for BRCA1/2 mutation with risk of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (study group) and those who were not examined for BRCA1/2 mutation without risk for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (control group). Matched variables were pathologic stage, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 status. All matching variables were successfully matched. Median follow-up duration was 57.8months. There was no significant difference between the groups in disease-free survival (log-rank P=0.197); however, the study group showed significantly better overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival (both P<0.0001). We conducted subgroup analysis in the middle-aged group (36-54) and showed no significant difference for disease-free survival (P=0.072) but significantly better overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival in the study group (P=0.002 and P<0.0001). BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer patients who had hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer risk factors showed similar disease-free survival and better overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival compared with those with sporadic breast cancer without hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer risk factors.

Genomic medicine year in review: 2021