Abstract
This paper exploits the randomized research design of a large welfare program–PROGRESA–to study the existence in rural Mexico of spillover effects in the propensity to screen for gender- and non-gender-specific conditions. I find significant evidence of increased demand for Papanicolaou cervical-cancer screening among women ineligible for the Conditional Cash Transfer, yet no evidence of similar externalities in non-gender specific tests, such as blood-pressure and blood-sugar checks. Certain pieces of evidence are suggestive of the weakening of the social norm related to husbands’ opposition to screening of their wives as one of the possible drivers of the indirect effect.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
