Abstract
To distinguish spermatic cord torsion from other intrascrotal pathology, scrotal ultrasound and radionuclide scanning have been highly recommended on the basis of both clinical and experimental studies. We review the data from six patients in whom ultrasound or nuclear medicine examination was misleading. We emphasize that history, physical examination, and urinalysis remain the cornerstones of the diagnosis of spermatic cord torsion. Scrotal ultrasound and nuclear medicine scans are useful adjuncts and are reassuring when in agreement with the clinical picture. However, they are not 100% sensitive or specific, and a negative study should not prevent emergency operative exploration of a clinically suspicious lesion.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
